Literature DB >> 9647944

Engineering analysis of penile hemodynamic and structural-dynamic relationships: Part III--Clinical considerations of penile hemodynamic and rigidity erectile responses.

D Udelson1, A Nehra, D G Hatzichristou, K Azadzoi, R B Moreland, R J Krane, I Saenz de Tejada, I Goldstein.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The extent to which hemodynamic erectile responses predict penile buckling forces has not previously been analytically investigated. An engineering study was performed to compare hemodynamic data with penile buckling force values.
METHODS: Dynamic infusion pharmacocavernosometry studies in 21 impotent patients (age 43, range 24-62 y) were accomplished to obtain information during penile erection concerning hemodynamic values, penile buckling forces and their determinants: intracavernosal pressure, erectile tissue mechanical properties and penile geometry.
RESULTS: In the 21 patients, discrepancies existed in several patients who demonstrated normal hemodynamic values (low flow-to-maintain and high equilibrium intracavernosal pressures) but elevated cavernosal compliance values and diminished penile buckling forces. There was poor correlation between cavernosal compliance and equilibrium intracavernosal pressure (r = -0.36); better correlation between compliance and expandability (r = -0.72) and best correlation between dimensionless compliance and the dimensionless product of expandability with equilibrium pressure (r = -0.88). These data implied that cavernosal compliance was dependent on multiple factors, not only equilibrium intracavernosal pressure.
CONCLUSIONS: Hemodynamic indices which correlate with intracavernosal pressure alone do not predict penile buckling forces since the latter are dependent not only on intracavernosal pressure but also on penile geometry and erectile tissue properties. The most relevant tissue property in predicting adequate penile buckling forces is cavernosal expandability. A new impotence classification system and diagnostic algorithm based on the determinants of penile rigidity and not exclusively on hemodynamic responses in proposed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9647944     DOI: 10.1038/sj.ijir.3900312

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Impot Res        ISSN: 0955-9930            Impact factor:   2.896


  4 in total

Review 1.  Biomechanics of male erectile function.

Authors:  Daniel Udelson
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2007-12-22       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Penile intracavernosal pillars: lessons from anatomy and potential implications for penile prosthesis placement.

Authors:  M J Pagano; A C Weinberg; C M Deibert; K Hernandez; J Alukal; L Zhao; S K Wilson; P H Egydio; R J Valenzuela
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 2.896

Review 3.  Applications of artificial intelligence in the diagnosis and prediction of erectile dysfunction: a narrative review.

Authors:  Yang Xiong; Yangchang Zhang; Fuxun Zhang; Changjing Wu; Feng Qin; Jiuhong Yuan
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 2.408

4.  Superficial tunica albuginea rupture as initial starting point of Peyronie's disease: a topic for interdisciplinary consideration.

Authors:  Ralf Herwig; Manfred Bayerl
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 3.411

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.