OBJECTIVE: To evaluate pain associated with chest tube insertion in a group of patients with malignant pleural effusions. DESIGN: Prospective case series. SETTING: Acute care cancer center in an academic institution. PATIENTS: Fifty-two patients with symptomatic malignant pleural effusions. Twenty-six evaluated by conventional approach to chest tube insertion (group 1), 26 evaluated after institution of a new chest tube protocol (group 2). INTERVENTIONS: A new protocol was designed to improve pain control during chest tube insertion. The protocol included improved housestaff and nursing education, premedication, proper insertion techniques, and more liberal and precise delivery of local anesthetic. OUTCOME MEASURES: Both groups were evaluated by a verbal self-report scale (1-10) to assess pain and anxiety. RESULTS: The mean pain rating in group 1 was 6.2 (+/-0.76) compared with 3.7 (+/-5.6) in group 2 (p < 0.01). In group 1, pain or anxiety was 9 or 10 in 12 of 26 on a scale of 1 to 10, compared with 2 of 26 in group 2 (p < 0.001). Anxiety rating was 4.5 (+/-0.72) in group 1 compared with 1.5 (+/-0.54) in group 2 (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Chest tube insertion was associated with an unacceptably high level of pain and anxiety in our hospital. A new protocol, including housestaff education and changes in nursing policies, technical aspects, local anesthetic dose and delivery, and pre-medication, allowed us to approach the goal of a painless chest tube insertion.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate pain associated with chest tube insertion in a group of patients with malignant pleural effusions. DESIGN: Prospective case series. SETTING: Acute care cancer center in an academic institution. PATIENTS: Fifty-two patients with symptomatic malignant pleural effusions. Twenty-six evaluated by conventional approach to chest tube insertion (group 1), 26 evaluated after institution of a new chest tube protocol (group 2). INTERVENTIONS: A new protocol was designed to improve pain control during chest tube insertion. The protocol included improved housestaff and nursing education, premedication, proper insertion techniques, and more liberal and precise delivery of local anesthetic. OUTCOME MEASURES: Both groups were evaluated by a verbal self-report scale (1-10) to assess pain and anxiety. RESULTS: The mean pain rating in group 1 was 6.2 (+/-0.76) compared with 3.7 (+/-5.6) in group 2 (p < 0.01). In group 1, pain or anxiety was 9 or 10 in 12 of 26 on a scale of 1 to 10, compared with 2 of 26 in group 2 (p < 0.001). Anxiety rating was 4.5 (+/-0.72) in group 1 compared with 1.5 (+/-0.54) in group 2 (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Chest tube insertion was associated with an unacceptably high level of pain and anxiety in our hospital. A new protocol, including housestaff education and changes in nursing policies, technical aspects, local anesthetic dose and delivery, and pre-medication, allowed us to approach the goal of a painless chest tube insertion.
Authors: I M Balfour-Lynn; E Abrahamson; G Cohen; J Hartley; S King; D Parikh; D Spencer; A H Thomson; D Urquhart Journal: Thorax Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 9.139
Authors: Nathan M Money; Alan R Schroeder; Ricardo A Quinonez; Timmy Ho; Jennifer R Marin; Elizabeth R Wolf; Daniel J Morgan; Sanket S Dhruva; Eric R Coon Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2022-02-01 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Wojciech Rokicki; Marek Rokicki; Jacek Wojtacha; Marek Filipowski; Agata Dżejlili; Damian Czyżewski Journal: Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol Date: 2016-12-30
Authors: John P Corcoran; Ioannis Psallidas; John M Wrightson; Robert J Hallifax; Najib M Rahman Journal: J Thorac Dis Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 2.895
Authors: Simon G A Brown; Emma L Ball; Kyle Perrin; Catherine A Read; Stephen E Asha; Richard Beasley; Diana Egerton-Warburton; Peter G Jones; Gerben Keijzers; Frances B Kinnear; Ben C H Kwan; Y C Gary Lee; Julian A Smith; Quentin A Summers; Graham Simpson Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2016-09-13 Impact factor: 2.692