Literature DB >> 9647165

Long-term follow-up review of patients who underwent laminectomy for lumbar stenosis: a prospective study.

M J Javid1, E J Hadar.   

Abstract

OBJECT: Decompressive laminectomy for stenosis is the most common operation performed in the lumbar spine in older patients. This prospective study was designed to evaluate long-term results in patients with symptomatic lumbar stenosis.
METHODS: Between January 1984 and January 1995, 170 patients underwent surgery for lumbar stenosis (86 patients), lumbar stenosis and herniated disc (61 patients), or lateral recess stenosis (23 patients). The male/female ratio for each group was 43:43, 39:22, and 14:9, respectively. The average age for all groups was 61.4 years. For patients with lumbar stenosis, the success rate was 88.1 % at 6 weeks and 86.7% at 6 months. For patients with lumbar stenosis and herniated disc, the success rate was 80% at 6 weeks and 77.6% at 6 months, with no statistically significant difference between the two groups. For patients with lateral recess stenosis, the success rate was 58.7% at 6 weeks and 63.6% at 6 months; however, the sample was not large enough to be statistically significant. One year after surgery a questionnaire was sent to all patients; 163 (95.9%) responded. The success rate in patients with stenosis had declined to 69.6%, which was significant (p = 0.012); the rate for patients with stenosis and herniated disc was 77.2%; and that for lateral recess stenosis was 65.2%. Another follow-up questionnaire was sent to patients 1 to 11 years after surgery (average 5.1 years); 146 patients (85.9%) responded, 10 (5.9%) were deceased, and 14 (8.2%) were lost to follow-up review. At 1 to 11 years the success rate was 70.8% for patients with stenosis, 66.6% for those with stenosis and herniated disc, and 63.6% for those with lateral recess stenosis. Eleven patients who underwent reoperation were included in the group of patients whose surgeries proved unsuccessful, regardless of their ultimate outcome. There was no statistically significant difference in outcome between 1 year and 1 to 11 years with respect to stenosis, stenosis with herniated disc, and lateral recess stenosis.
CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, long-term improvement after laminectomy was maintained in two-thirds of these patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9647165     DOI: 10.3171/jns.1998.89.1.0001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  27 in total

Review 1.  [Epidural spinal cord stimulation for therapy of chronic pain. Summary of the S3 guidelines].

Authors:  V Tronnier; R Baron; F Birklein; S Eckert; H Harke; D Horstkotte; P Hügler; M Hüppe; B Kniesel; C Maier; G Schütze; R Thoma; R D Treede; V Vadokas
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.107

2.  Survivorship analysis of 150 consecutive patients with DIAM™ implantation for surgery of lumbar spinal stenosis and disc herniation.

Authors:  Yoo-Joon Sur; Chae-Gwan Kong; Jong-Beom Park
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-10-17       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Cost-effectiveness of three treatment strategies for lumbar spinal stenosis: Conservative care, laminectomy, and the Superion interspinous spacer.

Authors:  Scott L Parker; Louise H Anderson; Teresa Nelson; Vikas V Patel
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-07-09

4.  Long-term outcome of decompressive surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in octogenarians.

Authors:  Shay Shabat; Zeev Arinzon; Yoram Folman; Josef Leitner; Rami David; Evgeny Pevzner; Reuven Gepstein; Ilya Pekarsky; Ishay Shuval
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-10-17       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Midterm outcome after unilateral approach for bilateral decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: 5-year prospective study.

Authors:  Halit Cavuşoğlu; Ramazan Alper Kaya; Osman Nuri Türkmenoglu; Cengiz Tuncer; Ibrahim Colak; Yunus Aydin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-08-22       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Decompressive surgery for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: long-term results.

Authors:  Ioannis D Gelalis; Kosmas S Stafilas; Anastasios V Korompilias; Konstantinos C Zacharis; Alexandros E Beris; Theodoros A Xenakis
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2005-11-25       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Five-year outcome of surgical decompression of the lumbar spine without fusion.

Authors:  Anne F Mannion; R Denzler; J Dvorak; D Grob
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-07-31       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 8.  Metal-induced artifacts in MRI.

Authors:  Brian A Hargreaves; Pauline W Worters; Kim Butts Pauly; John M Pauly; Kevin M Koch; Garry E Gold
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Lower limb pain caused by insufficient muscular microcirculation.

Authors:  Jung-Tung Liu; Wen-Jui Liao; Cheng-Siu Chang; Yung-Hsiang Chen
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 0.656

10.  A predictive model for outcome after conservative decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  K F Spratt; T S Keller; M Szpalski; K Vandeputte; R Gunzburg
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-12-05       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.