Literature DB >> 9646893

P300 and the thought disorder factor extracted by factor-analytic procedures in schizophrenia.

M Higashima1, K Urata, Y Kawasaki, Y Maeda, N Sakai, C Mizukoshi, T Nagasawa, T Kamiya, N Yamaguchi, Y Koshino.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In order to clarify the clinical significance of P300 as a biologic marker that can reflect schizophrenic symptomatology, many previous studies have evaluated the relationship of P300 with the symptoms on the basis of a positive/negative dichotomy, but yielded inconsistent conclusions. Such a dichotomy has been criticized as being too reductionistic. Recently, most studies with factor-analytic procedures have extracted some symptom factors outside this dichotomy. Therefore, it is important to examine associations of P300 with the symptom factors extracted by these statistical analyses.
METHODS: In the present study, the amplitudes of P300 were measured by using an auditory oddball paradigm for 73 schizophrenics whose psychopathology was assessed with the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS).
RESULTS: The principal component analysis of the PANSS items revealed five factors labeled the thought disorder, negative, hostile/excitable, delusional/hallucinatory, and depressive factors. The score for the thought disorder factor correlated negatively with the amplitude of P300 recorded at Pz T5, and T6, but that for the other factors did not.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that the reduction of P300 amplitudes recorded at the midline parietal and bilateral temporoparietal regions may be one of the electrophysiologic indices representing the thought disorder clinically observed in schizophrenia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9646893     DOI: 10.1016/s0006-3223(97)00359-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Psychiatry        ISSN: 0006-3223            Impact factor:   13.382


  6 in total

1.  Searching for a consensus five-factor model of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale for schizophrenia.

Authors:  R S Wallwork; R Fortgang; R Hashimoto; D R Weinberger; D Dickinson
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 4.939

2.  Somatosensory system deficits in schizophrenia revealed by MEG during a median-nerve oddball task.

Authors:  Ming-Xiong Huang; Roland R Lee; Kathleen M Gaa; Tao Song; Deborah L Harrington; Cathy Loh; Rebecca J Theilmann; J Christopher Edgar; Gregory A Miller; Jose M Canive; Eric Granholm
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2009-11-27       Impact factor: 3.020

3.  Dose-related modulation of event-related potentials to novel and target stimuli by intravenous Δ⁹-THC in humans.

Authors:  Deepak Cyril D'Souza; Daniel J Fridberg; Patrick D Skosnik; Ashley Williams; Brian Roach; Nagendra Singh; Michelle Carbuto; Jacqueline Elander; Ashley Schnakenberg; Brian Pittman; R Andrew Sewell; Mohini Ranganathan; Daniel Mathalon
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 7.853

4.  Changes in Event-Related Desynchronization and Synchronization during the Auditory Oddball Task in Schizophrenia Patients.

Authors:  Toshiro Fujimoto; Eiichi Okumura; Kouzou Takeuchi; Atsushi Kodabashi; Hiroaki Tanaka; Toshiaki Otsubo; Katsumi Nakamura; Masaki Sekine; Shinichiro Kamiya; Yuji Higashi; Miwa Tsuji; Susumu Shimooki; Toshiyo Tamura
Journal:  Open Neuroimag J       Date:  2012-06-01

5.  Multilevel ordinal factor analysis of the positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS).

Authors:  Jan Stochl; Peter B Jones; James Plaistow; Ulrich Reininghaus; Stefan Priebe; Jesus Perez; Tim J Croudace
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 4.035

6.  Functional abnormalities in the cortical processing of sound complexity and musical consonance in schizophrenia: evidence from an evoked potential study.

Authors:  Kuan-Yi Wu; Ching-Wen Chao; Ching-I Hung; Wei-Hong Chen; Yung-Ting Chen; Sheng-Fu Liang
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 3.630

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.