Literature DB >> 9646049

Linking research and policy to ensure children's environmental health.

L R Goldman1.   

Abstract

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) has made protecting children's environmental health its highest priority. Data on how and when children may be at risk are vital for accomplishing this goal. Recent examples of the link between research and policy include U.S. EPA actions to carry out the recommendations of the National Academy of Sciences on pesticides in children's food, reduce and prevent childhood lead poisoning, and revise national ambient air quality standards for ozone and particulate matter. Today, the Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA), which makes protecting children from pesticide residues in food a national priority, is contributing to the growing need for data for decision making. Further impetus comes from provisions in the FQPA and 1996 Safe Drinking Water Act Amendments for establishing a screening and testing program for potential risks from endocrine disruptors. Another factor is the analysis that will be required under President William J. Clinton's executive order directing all federal agencies, for the first time, to reduce environmental health and safety risks to children. Success of the U.S. international commitment to protect children is directly tied to the strength and availability of environmental data. To meet such challenges, the U.S. EPA is revising key science policies, expanding research opportunities, and adding to the public's right-to-know tools. In this dynamic climate, there are growing opportunities for the research community to play a greater role in helping ensure the well-being of children living today and in generations to come.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9646049      PMCID: PMC1533059          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.98106857

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  6 in total

1.  How risky is risk assessment: the role that life history strategies play in susceptibility of species to stress.

Authors:  John D Stark; John E Banks; Roger Vargas
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-01-12       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Farmworker children's residential non-dietary exposure estimates from micro-level activity time series.

Authors:  Paloma I Beamer; Robert A Canales; Asa Bradman; James O Leckie
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2009-09-09       Impact factor: 9.621

3.  Analysis of aggregate exposure to chlorpyrifos in the NHEXAS-Maryland investigation.

Authors:  Yaohong Pang; David L MacIntosh; David E Camann; P Barry Ryan
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 4.  Adolescent health and the environment.

Authors:  M S Golub
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 9.031

5.  Protecting children from environmental toxins.

Authors:  Bruce P Lanphear; Charles V Vorhees; David C Bellinger
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2005-03-29       Impact factor: 11.069

Review 6.  A Review of the Field on Children's Exposure to Environmental Contaminants: A Risk Assessment Approach.

Authors:  Alesia Ferguson; Rosalind Penney; Helena Solo-Gabriele
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-03-04       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.