Literature DB >> 9645526

Porous-coated versus grit-blasted surface texture of hydroxyapatite-coated implants during controlled micromotion: mechanical and histomorphometric results.

S Overgaard1, M Lind, H Glerup, C Bünger, K Søballe.   

Abstract

Hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated implants with porous-coated and grit-blasted surface textures were inserted bilaterally in a paired design into the medial femoral condyles of eight dogs for 16 weeks. The implants were weight-loaded and initially subjected to controlled micromotion of 500 microm during each gait cycle. Histology revealed that five implants in each group had bony anchorage, and the remaining implants were surrounded by fibrous tissue. Push-out testing showed no difference in shear stiffness and strength, while energy absorption for porous-coated implants was increased significantly by threefold. The HA coating delaminated on grit-blasted implants during push-out testing, whereas porous-coated implants predominantly failed at the HA-tissue interface. Coverage, surface area, volume, and thickness of the HA coating were significantly reduced in vivo for porous-coated and grit-blasted implants. In conclusion, a plasma-sprayed porous-coated implant surface seems to give better fixation not only of the HA-coating to the implant surface but also of the implant to the surrounding tissues in comparison to a grit-blasted implant surface. The HA coating was reduced more on fibrous-anchored than on bony-anchored implants, suggesting that micromotion accelerates resorption of HA. Resorbed HA coating was replaced by more bone on porous-coated implants than on grit-blasted implants, which suggests that fixation of porous-coated implants will be durable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9645526     DOI: 10.1016/s0883-5403(98)90011-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  5 in total

1.  Biomechanical evaluation of an interfacet joint decompression and stabilization system.

Authors:  Jeremi M Leasure; Jenni Buckley
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.097

Review 2.  The role of hydroxyapatite coating in joint replacement surgery - Key considerations.

Authors:  Jonathan Botterill; Harman Khatkar
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2022-04-22

3.  Excessive distal migration of fiber-mesh coated femoral stems.

Authors:  Thomas Baad-Hansen; Søren Kold; Niels Olsen; Finn Christensen; Kjeld Søballe
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 3.717

4.  No superior performance of hydroxyapatite-coated acetabular cups over porous-coated cups.

Authors:  Kestutis Valancius; Kjeld Søballe; Poul T Nielsen; Mogens B Laursen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 3.717

5.  The Effects of Interlocking a Universal Hip Cementless Stem on Implant Subsidence and Mechanical Properties of Cadaveric Canine Femora.

Authors:  Yonathan Buks; Kirk L Wendelburg; Susan M Stover; Tanya C Garcia-Nolen
Journal:  Vet Surg       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 1.495

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.