Literature DB >> 9645399

Comments on a commentary: statistical evaluation of split mouth caries trials.

M Vaeth1, S Poulsen.   

Abstract

When results of split mouth caries trials are reported, the most frequently used outcome measures are "effectiveness" and "net gain". In a recent review by Riordan & FitzGerald (Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1994;22:192-7) of the statistical analysis of data from such trials, the close connection between effectiveness and the traditional epidemiological outcome measure, relative risk, was pointed out and the latter measure was recommended. The confidence intervals for these parameters were, however, incorrect. This note provides valid confidence intervals for net gain, effectiveness and relative risk based on data from split mouth trials and presents examples of the calculations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9645399     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1998.tb01930.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Community Dent Oral Epidemiol        ISSN: 0301-5661            Impact factor:   3.383


  2 in total

1.  Calculating unreported confidence intervals for paired data.

Authors:  Karim F Hirji; Morten W Fagerland
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 4.615

2.  Comparison of intervention effects in split-mouth and parallel-arm randomized controlled trials: a meta-epidemiological study.

Authors:  Violaine Smaïl-Faugeron; Hélène Fron-Chabouis; Frédéric Courson; Pierre Durieux
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2014-05-11       Impact factor: 4.615

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.