Literature DB >> 9643358

Small dense low density lipoprotein has increased affinity for LDL receptor-independent cell surface binding sites: a potential mechanism for increased atherogenicity.

N F Galeano1, M Al-Haideri, F Keyserman, S C Rumsey, R J Deckelbaum.   

Abstract

Small dense low density lipoprotein (LDL) particles have altered apolipoprotein (apo) B conformation and lowered affinity for the LDL receptor (J. Biol. Chem. 1994. 269: 511-519). Herein, we examine the interaction of small dense LDL with cell LDL receptor-independent binding sites. Compared to normal LDL, at low LDL cell media concentrations (<10 microg/ml), small dense LDL had decreased specific binding to the LDL receptor on normal fibroblasts at 4 degrees C, but a 2-fold increased binding to LDL receptor-independent cell sites. At higher LDL concentration (100 microg/ ml), LDL receptor-independent binding of small dense LDL was 4.5-fold that of normal LDL in normal fibroblasts, but greater (2- to 14- fold) in LDL receptor-negative fibroblasts. In LDL receptor-negative fibroblasts at 37 degrees C, small dense LDL had higher (3-fold) cell association than normal size LDL but no effective LDL degradation. At high LDL concentrations (> or =100 microg/ml), LDL binding to normal or LDL receptor-negative fibroblasts was not affected by several anti-apoB monoclonal antibodies or by cell pretreatment with proteases, chondroitinase, or neuraminidase. In contrast, pretreating normal and receptor-negative fibroblasts with heparinase and heparitinase decreased LDL cell binding by 35% and 50%, respectively. Similarly, preincubation of receptor-negative fibroblasts with sodium chlorate, an inhibitor of proteoglycan sulfation, decreased LDL binding by about 45%. We hypothesize that small dense LDL might be more atherogenic than normal size LDL due to decreased hepatic clearance by the LDL receptor, and enhanced anchoring to LDL receptor-independent binding sites in extrahepatic tissues (e.g., the arterial wall), a process mediated, in part, by cell surface proteoglycans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9643358

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Lipid Res        ISSN: 0022-2275            Impact factor:   5.922


  40 in total

Review 1.  LDL particle size: an important drug target?

Authors:  I Rajman; P I Eacho; P J Chowienczyk; J M Ritter
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Conway Memorial Lecture 2002. The dyslipidaemia of diabetes: lessons in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis.

Authors:  G H Tomkin
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2002 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.568

3.  Does simultaneous determination of LDL and HDL particle size improve prediction of coronary artery disease risk?

Authors:  Aleksandra Zeljkovic; Vesna Spasojevic-Kalimanovska; Jelena Vekic; Zorana Jelic-Ivanovic; Aleksandra Topic; Natasa Bogavac-Stanojevic; Slavica Spasic; Ana Vujovic; Dimitra Kalimanovska-Ostric
Journal:  Clin Exp Med       Date:  2008-07-11       Impact factor: 3.984

4.  Japan Atherosclerosis Society (JAS) Guidelines for Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Diseases 2017.

Authors:  Makoto Kinoshita; Koutaro Yokote; Hidenori Arai; Mami Iida; Yasushi Ishigaki; Shun Ishibashi; Seiji Umemoto; Genshi Egusa; Hirotoshi Ohmura; Tomonori Okamura; Shinji Kihara; Shinji Koba; Isao Saito; Tetsuo Shoji; Hiroyuki Daida; Kazuhisa Tsukamoto; Juno Deguchi; Seitaro Dohi; Kazushige Dobashi; Hirotoshi Hamaguchi; Masumi Hara; Takafumi Hiro; Sadatoshi Biro; Yoshio Fujioka; Chizuko Maruyama; Yoshihiro Miyamoto; Yoshitaka Murakami; Masayuki Yokode; Hiroshi Yoshida; Hiromi Rakugi; Akihiko Wakatsuki; Shizuya Yamashita
Journal:  J Atheroscler Thromb       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 4.928

5.  The elevation of apoB in hypercholesterolemic patients is primarily attributed to the relative increase of apoB/Lp-PLA₂.

Authors:  Constantinos C Tellis; Eliza Moutzouri; Moses Elisaf; Robert L Wolfert; Alexandros D Tselepis
Journal:  J Lipid Res       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 5.922

6.  n-3, but not n-6 lipid particle uptake requires cell surface anchoring.

Authors:  Faith M Murray-Taylor; Yuan-Yuan Ho; Narumon Densupsoontorn; Chuchun L Chang; Richard J Deckelbaum; Toru Seo
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2010-01-07       Impact factor: 3.575

7.  Do HDL and LDL subfractions play a role in atherosclerosis in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients?

Authors:  Anna Gluba-Brzózka; Beata Franczyk; Maciej Banach; Magdalena Rysz-Górzyńska
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 2.370

8.  Significance of small dense low-density lipoprotein as a risk factor for coronary artery disease and acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Sung Woo Kwon; Se-Jung Yoon; Tae Soo Kang; Hyuck Moon Kwon; Jeong-Ho Kim; Jihyuk Rhee; Sung-Ju Lee; Jong-Kwan Park; Jae Yun Lim; Young Won Yoon; Bum Kee Hong
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2006-06-30       Impact factor: 2.759

9.  The effect of PPARgamma-agonism on LDL subclass profile in patients with type 2 diabetes and coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Riikka Lautamäki; Pirjo Nuutila; K E Juhani Airaksinen; Aila Leino; Heikki Hiekkanen; Marian Turiceanu; Murray Stewart; Juhani Knuuti; Tapani Rönnemaa
Journal:  Rev Diabet Stud       Date:  2006-05-10

10.  New automated assay of small dense low-density lipoprotein cholesterol identifies risk of coronary heart disease: the Multi-ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Michael Y Tsai; Brian T Steffen; Weihua Guan; Robyn L McClelland; Russell Warnick; Joseph McConnell; Daniel M Hoefner; Alan T Remaley
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 8.311

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.