Literature DB >> 9643305

Maternal anxiety and attitudes to universal neonatal hearing screening.

P M Watkin1, M Baldwin, R Dixon, A Beckman.   

Abstract

Neonatal hearing screening of all babies within the maternity unit is now feasible using transient evoked otoacoustic emission (TEOAE) recording. However, in many maternity units in the United Kingdom, the majority of babies are discharged within the first 48 hours. During the first two days of life, there is a higher proportion of babies in whom emissions cannot be recorded. A universal TEOAE hearing screen has been implemented in Whipps Cross Hospital. As 70% of the babies are discharged from the maternity unit before they are 48 hours old, a two stage screen was implemented, with failure at the initial TEOAE test being followed by a retest after 4-6 weeks. The maternal anxiety caused by this model was investigated in 288 mothers enrolled for the initial TEOAE test. Generally, anxiety was low and attitudes towards the screen were positive. Ninety-seven per cent of mothers considered the screen to be worthwhile at the initial test with 15% feeling it had caused some anxiety but less than 1% being very worried. The mothers who had some anxieties were not dissatisfied with the screen, and within this group there was no increase in the proportion of babies who had failed the initial test. At the retest, two of 57 mothers (3.5%) considered they were very worried, but there was no significant deterioration in attitude towards the screen. Spielberger's State-Trait Anxiety Inventory revealed no significant difference in the anxiety state of the retest group when compared with a control group whose babies had not received a neonatal hearing test. The results of the initial test and the retest did not influence the anxiety state of the mothers. Ways of minimizing anxiety caused to a minority of mothers whilst maintaining positive attitudes to the screen are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9643305     DOI: 10.3109/03005364000000048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Audiol        ISSN: 0300-5364


  13 in total

Review 1.  Neonatal screening for hearing impairment.

Authors:  C R Kennedy
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 2.  Universal neonatal hearing screening moving from evidence to practice.

Authors:  C Kennedy; D McCann
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.747

3.  Interdisciplinary approach to design, performance, and quality management in a multicenter newborn hearing screening project. Discussion of the results of newborn hearing screening in Hamburg (part II).

Authors:  Anna-Katharina Rohlfs; Thomas Wiesner; Holger Drews; Frank Müller; Achim Breitfuss; Regina Schiller; Markus Hess
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 3.183

4.  Community based universal neonatal hearing screening by health visitors using otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  M Owen; M Webb; K Evans
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.747

5.  Ethical issues in screening for hearing impairment in newborns in developing countries.

Authors:  B O Olusanya; L M Luxon; S L Wirz
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.903

6.  Prevalence of permanent childhood hearing impairment in the United Kingdom and implications for universal neonatal hearing screening: questionnaire based ascertainment study.

Authors:  H M Fortnum; A Q Summerfield; D H Marshall; A C Davis; J M Bamford
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-09-08

7.  [Pregnant women's expectations concerning universal newborn hearing screening].

Authors:  L Freund; M Hintermair
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.284

8.  Parental experiences of the newborn hearing screening programme in Wales: a postal questionnaire survey.

Authors:  Rosemary Fox; Sally Minchom
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.377

9.  Role of the "rooming-in" on efficacy of universal neonatal hearing screening programmes.

Authors:  D L Grasso; S Hatzopulos; P Cossu; F Ciarafoni; M Rossi; A Martini; E Zocconi
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.124

10.  Six month impact of false positives in an Australian infant hearing screening programme.

Authors:  Z Poulakis; M Barker; M Wake
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.791

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.