Literature DB >> 9643231

Evaluation of oral hygiene products: science is true; don't be misled by the facts.

M Addy1, J M Moran.   

Abstract

Most people in industrialized countries use oral hygiene products. When an oral health benefit is expected, it is important that sufficient scientific evidence exist to support such claims. Ideally, data should be cumulative derived from studies in vitro and in vivo. The data should be available to the profession for evaluation by publication in refereed scientific journals. Terms and phrases require clarification, and claims made by implication or derived by inference must be avoided. Similarity in products is not necessarily proof per se of efficacy. Studies in vitro and in vivo should follow the basic principles of scientific research. Studies must be ethical, avoid bias and be suitably controlled. A choice of controls will vary depending on whether an agent or a whole product is evaluated and the development stage of a formulation. Where appropriate, new products should be compared with products already available and used by the general public. Conformity with the guidelines for good clinical practice appears to be a useful way of validating studies and a valuable guide to the profession. Studies should be designed with sufficient power to detect statistically significant differences if these exist. However, consideration must be given to the clinical significance of statistically significant differences between formulations since these are not necessarily the same. Studies in vitro provide supportive data but extrapolation to clinical effect is difficult and even misleading, and such data should not stand alone as proof of efficacy of a product. Short-term studies in vivo provide useful information, particularly at the development stage. Ideally, however, products should be proved effective when used in the circumstances for which they are developed. Nevertheless, a variety of variable influence the outcome of home-use studies, and the influence of the variable cannot usually be calculated. Although rarely considered, the cost-benefit ratio of some oral hygiene products needs to be considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9643231     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0757.1997.tb00103.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Periodontol 2000        ISSN: 0906-6713            Impact factor:   7.589


  8 in total

1.  Antibacterial effect of taurolidine (2%) on established dental plaque biofilm.

Authors:  Nicole Birgit Arweiler; Thorsten Mathias Auschill; Anton Sculean
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  A randomized clinical trial to evaluate and compare the efficacy of triphala mouthwash with 0.2% chlorhexidine in hospitalized patients with periodontal diseases.

Authors:  Ritam S Naiktari; Pratima Gaonkar; Abhijit N Gurav; Sujeet V Khiste
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 2.614

3.  In vivo substantivity of 0.12% and 0.2% chlorhexidine mouthrinses on salivary bacteria.

Authors:  Maria Consuelo Cousido; Inmaculada Tomás Carmona; Lucia García-Caballero; Jacobo Limeres; Maximiliano Alvarez; Pedro Diz
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2009-08-08       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Impact of different concentrations of an octenidine dihydrochloride mouthwash on salivary bacterial counts: a randomized, placebo-controlled cross-over trial.

Authors:  Katrin Lorenz; Yvonne Jockel-Schneider; Nicole Petersen; Peggy Stölzel; Markus Petzold; Ulrich Vogel; Thomas Hoffmann; Ulrich Schlagenhauf; Barbara Noack
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  A randomized controlled clinical study of the effect of daily intake of Ascophyllum nodosum alga on calculus, plaque, and gingivitis.

Authors:  Jan W V van Dijken; S Koistinen; Per Ramberg
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 6.  Periodontal Research: Basics and beyond - Part I (Defining the research problem, study design and levels of evidence).

Authors:  Haritha Avula; Ruchi Pandey; Vijayalakshmi Bolla; Harika Rao; Jaya Kumar Avula
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2013-09

7.  Evaluation of antiplaque and antigingivitis effect of herbal mouthwash in treatment of plaque induced gingivitis: A randomized, clinical trial.

Authors:  Shivanand Aspalli; V Sudhir Shetty; M V Devarathnamma; G Nagappa; D Archana; Prachi Parab
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2014-01

8.  Influence of the Culture Medium in Dose-Response Effect of the Chlorhexidine on Streptococcus mutans Biofilms.

Authors:  Vanessa Salvadego de Queiroz; Renzo Alberto Ccahuana-Vásquez; Alcides Fabiano Tedesco; Luzia Lyra; Jaime Aparecido Cury; Angélica Zaninelli Schreiber
Journal:  Scientifica (Cairo)       Date:  2016-05-11
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.