Literature DB >> 9643060

Effects of stimulus modality and task condition on blink startle modification and on electrodermal responses.

O V Lipp1, D A Siddle, P J Dall.   

Abstract

Participants in Experiments 1 and 2 performed a discrimination and counting task to assess the effect of lead stimulus modality on attentional modification of the acoustic startle reflex. Modality of the discrimination stimuli was changed across subjects. Electrodermal responses were larger during task-relevant stimuli than during task-irrelevant stimuli in all conditions. Larger blink magnitude facilitation was found during auditory and visual task-relevant stimuli, but not for tactile stimuli. Experiment 3 used acoustic, visual, and tactile conditioned stimuli (CSs) in differential conditioning with an aversive unconditioned stimulus (US). Startle magnitude facilitation and electrodermal responses were larger during a CS that preceded the US than during a CS that was presented alone regardless of lead stimulus modality. Although not unequivocal, the present data pose problems for attentional accounts of blink modification that emphasize the importance of lead stimulus modality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9643060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  5 in total

1.  Modification of the human blink reflex by transient and sustained features of acoustic prestimulation.

Authors:  K Reilly; G Hammond
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  The effects of multiphasic prepulses on automatic and attention-modulated prepulse inhibition.

Authors:  Albert B Poje; Diane L Filion
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2017-04-11

3.  An alternative scoring method for skin conductance responding in a differential fear conditioning paradigm with a long-duration conditioned stimulus.

Authors:  Suzanne L Pineles; Matthew R Orr; Scott P Orr
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2009-06-22       Impact factor: 4.016

4.  Prospective study comparing skin impedance with EEG parameters during the induction of anaesthesia with fentanyl and etomidate.

Authors:  Michael Winterhalter; S Münte; M Gerhard; O Danzeisen; T Jüttner; E Monaca; L Hoy; N Rahe-Meyer; P Kienbaum
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 2.175

5.  A cost minimisation and Bayesian inference model predicts startle reflex modulation across species.

Authors:  Dominik R Bach
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 2.691

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.