Literature DB >> 9642510

Incidence of leukopenia and cytomegalovirus disease in kidney transplants treated with mycophenolate mofetil combined with low cyclosporine and steroid doses.

F Moreso1, D Serón, J M Morales, J M Cruzado, S Gil-Vernet, J L Pérez, X Fulladosa, A Andrés, J M Grinyó.   

Abstract

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) combined with conventional cyclosporine and steroids doses efficiently prevents acute rejection in kidney transplants. However, this regimen has been associated with an increased incidence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease and leukopenia, specially in patients receiving MMF at 3 g/d, suggesting that the combination of two powerful immunosuppressants carries the risk of overimmunosuppression. For this reason, we treated a group of patients with MMF 3 g/d combined with low cyclosporine and steroids doses. Eighty-two kidney transplants performed at two centers and enrolled in the European Mycophenolate Mofetil Cooperative Study were randomized to receive: A) placebo (n = 27); B) MMF 2 g/d (n = 27); and C) MMF 3 g/d (n = 28). In this double blind study all patients received cyclosporine and steroids at conventional doses. Fifteen kidney transplants enrolled in an MMF open pharmacokinetic study were treated with MMF 3 g/day combined with low cyclosporine and steroid doses (group D). Efficacy was evaluated as the incidence of biopsy proven acute rejection, and safety focused on CMV disease and leukopenia. Patients receiving MMF showed a low incidence of biopsy proven rejection (B) 18.5%; C) 10.7%; and D) 13.3%). Patients of group C had a high incidence of CMV disease (35.7%) when compared with the other groups (lower than 8%). Incidence of leukopenia was higher in patients treated with MMF (B) 25.9%; C) 39.3%; and D) 40%) than in placebo treated patients (7.4%). Patients in group (C) displayed leukopenia mainly in the context of CMV disease, while patients of group (D) had leukopenia not related to CMV infection. All patients of group (D) who presented leukopenia recovered after MMF reduction dose, while in group (C) there were 5 out of 28 patients who required MMF withdrawal. We propose that a reasonable approach to take advantage of a powerful non-nephrotoxic immunosuppressant such as MMF, could be the administration of this drug at 3 g/d from the time of transplantation combined with low CsA and steroid doses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9642510

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Transplant        ISSN: 0902-0063            Impact factor:   2.863


  13 in total

1.  Clinical relevance of direct quantification of pp65 antigenemia using flow cytometry in solid organ and stem cell transplant recipients.

Authors:  A S Poirier-Toulemonde; N Milpied; D Cantarovich; J F Morcet; S Billaudel; B M Imbert-Marcille
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  Mycophenolate mofetil: effects on cellular immune subsets, infectious complications, and antimicrobial activity.

Authors:  M L Ritter; L Pirofski
Journal:  Transpl Infect Dis       Date:  2009-05-26       Impact factor: 2.228

Review 3.  New strategies for prevention and therapy of cytomegalovirus infection and disease in solid-organ transplant recipients.

Authors:  I G Sia; R Patel
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 26.132

4.  Successful induction of granulomatosis with polyangiitis with tacrolimus.

Authors:  R Ramachandran; S Tiwana; D Prabhakar; K Gowda; R Nada; V Kumar; M Rathi; H S Kohli; V Jha; K L Gupta; V Sakhuja
Journal:  Indian J Nephrol       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb

Review 5.  Cytomegalovirus infection and abdominal pain with mycophenolate mofetil: is there a link?

Authors:  H Gallagher; P A Andrews
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.606

6.  Clinical Pharmacodynamics: Principles of Drug Response and Alterations in Kidney Disease.

Authors:  Frieder Keller; Alexander Hann
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 7.  Viral infection after renal transplantation: surveillance and management.

Authors:  Blair C Weikert; Emily A Blumberg
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 8.237

8.  Monitoring of nonsteroidal immunosuppressive drugs in patients with lung disease and lung transplant recipients: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  Robert P Baughman; Keith C Meyer; Ian Nathanson; Luis Angel; Sangeeta M Bhorade; Kevin M Chan; Daniel Culver; Christopher G Harrod; Mary S Hayney; Kristen B Highland; Andrew H Limper; Herbert Patrick; Charlie Strange; Timothy Whelan
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 9.  Prevention of complications from use of conventional immunosuppressants: a critical review.

Authors:  Claudio Ponticelli; Richard J Glassock
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 4.393

10.  Safety of immunosuppressive drugs used as maintenance therapy in kidney transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Celline Cardoso Almeida; Micheline Rosa Silveira; Vânia Eloisa de Araújo; Livia Lovato Pires de Lemos; Juliana de Oliveira Costa; Carlos Augusto Lins Reis; Francisco de Assis Acurcio; Maria das Gracas Braga Ceccato
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2013-09-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.