Literature DB >> 9642290

Regulation of expression within a gene family. The case of the rat gammaB- and gammaD-crystallin promoters.

E J Klok1, S T van Genesen, A Civil, J G Schoenmakers, N H Lubsen.   

Abstract

The six closely related and clustered rat gamma-crystallin genes, the gammaA- to gammaF-crystallin genes, are simultaneously activated in the embryonic lens but differentially shut down during postnatal development with the gammaB-crystallin gene, the last one to be active. We show here that developmental silencing of the gammaD-crystallin promoter correlates with delayed demethylation during lens fiber cell differentiation. Methylation silencing of the gammaD-crystallin promoter is a general effect and does not require the methylation of a specific CpG, nor does methylation interfere with factor binding to the proximal activator. In later development, the gammaD-crystallin promoter is also shut down earlier by a repressor that footprints to the -91/-78 region. A factor with identical properties is present in brain. Hence, a ubiquitous factor has been recruited as a developmental regulator by the lens. All gamma-crystallin promoters tested contain upstream silencers, but at least the gammaB-crystallin silencer is distinct from the gammaD-crystallin silencer. The gamma-crystallin promoters were found to share a proximal activator (the gamma-box; around -50), which behaves as a MARE. The gammaB-box is recognized with much lower avidity than the gammaD-box. By swapping elements between the gammaB- and the gammaD-crystallin promoter, we show that activation by the gammaB-box requires a directly adjacent -46/-38 AP-1 consensus site. These experiments also uncovered another positive element in the gammaD-crystallin promoter, around -10. In the context of the gammaD-crystallin promoter, this element is redundant; in the context of the gammaB-crystallin promoter, it can replace the -46/-38 element.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9642290     DOI: 10.1074/jbc.273.27.17206

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  9 in total

Review 1.  Genetic and epigenetic mechanisms of gene regulation during lens development.

Authors:  Ales Cvekl; Melinda K Duncan
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2007-07-28       Impact factor: 21.198

2.  c-Maf, the gammaD-crystallin Maf-responsive element and growth factor regulation.

Authors:  Azem Civil; Siebe T van Genesen; Nicolette H Lubsen
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-02-15       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 3.  The Role of DNA Methylation in Lens Development and Cataract Formation.

Authors:  Yong Wang; Huaijin Guan
Journal:  Cell Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 5.046

4.  Uhrf1 and Dnmt1 are required for development and maintenance of the zebrafish lens.

Authors:  Rachel K Tittle; Ryan Sze; Anthony Ng; Richard J Nuckels; Mary E Swartz; Ryan M Anderson; Justin Bosch; Didier Y R Stainier; Johann K Eberhart; Jeffrey M Gross
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 3.582

Review 5.  Epigenetic regulation of anterior segment diseases and potential therapeutics.

Authors:  Eric Chen; Kelley Bohm; Mark Rosenblatt; Kai Kang
Journal:  Ocul Surf       Date:  2020-04-25       Impact factor: 5.033

Review 6.  Epigenetic regulatory mechanisms in vertebrate eye development and disease.

Authors:  A Cvekl; K P Mitton
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 3.821

7.  A delayed antioxidant response in heat-stressed cells expressing a non-DNA binding HSF1 mutant.

Authors:  Sanne M M Hensen; Lonneke Heldens; Siebe T van Genesen; Ger J M Pruijn; Nicolette H Lubsen
Journal:  Cell Stress Chaperones       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 3.667

8.  JNK initiates a cytokine cascade that causes Pax2 expression and closure of the optic fissure.

Authors:  Claire R Weston; Anthony Wong; J Perry Hall; Mary E P Goad; Richard A Flavell; Roger J Davis
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 11.361

9.  Heat shock factor 1 is inactivated by amino acid deprivation.

Authors:  Sanne M M Hensen; Lonneke Heldens; Chrissy M W van Enckevort; Siebe T van Genesen; Ger J M Pruijn; Nicolette H Lubsen
Journal:  Cell Stress Chaperones       Date:  2012-07-14       Impact factor: 3.667

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.