Literature DB >> 9642010

Dominance between booby nestlings involves winner and loser effects.

.   

Abstract

Two-chick broods of the blue-footed booby, Sula nebouxii, ordinarily exhibit stable dominance-subordinance, with the senior (first-hatched) chick habitually aggressive and the junior one habitually submissive (Nelson 1978, The Sulidae: Gannets and Boobies. London: Oxford University Press). But are both the subordinate and the dominant chick affected in their agonistic tendencies by early social experience? To answer this, we permanently paired subordinate and dominant chicks, 2-3 weeks old, with singletons (chicks lacking experience with a nestmate) by cross-fostering. During the first 4 h after pairing, subordinate chicks were seven times less aggressive than singletons and twice as likely to be submissive; dominant chicks were six times as aggressive as singletons. Although most subordinates consistently lost agonistic encounters during the first 10 days after pairing, the proportion of dominants that won decreased progressively until, by day 6, only about half of dominant chicks were winning. Early social experience has a strong but reversable training effect on both subordinates and dominants. Training as a subordinate showed more persistent effects than training as a dominant, possibly in part because our testing situation perpetuated subordinate training and counteracted dominant training. Copyright 1998 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour. Copyright 1998 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.

Entities:  

Year:  1998        PMID: 9642010     DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1997.0714

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Behav        ISSN: 0003-3472            Impact factor:   2.844


  8 in total

1.  Coalition formation in animals and the nature of winner and loser effects.

Authors:  R A Johnstone; L A Dugatkin
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Natural 'poor start' does not increase mortality over the lifetime.

Authors:  H Drummond; C Rodríguez; D Oro
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Short and long-lasting behavioral consequences of agonistic encounters between male Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Séverine Trannoy; Jill Penn; Kenia Lucey; David Popovic; Edward A Kravitz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Sibling rivalry: training effects, emergence of dominance and incomplete control.

Authors:  Sarah Benhaiem; Heribert Hofer; Stephanie Kramer-Schadt; Edgar Brunner; Marion L East
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Effects of photoperiod and experience on aggressive behavior in female California mice.

Authors:  Andrea L Silva; William H D Fry; Colleen Sweeney; Brian C Trainor
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2010-01-07       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Tyraminergic modulation of agonistic outcomes in crayfish.

Authors:  Yuto Momohara; Hitoshi Aonuma; Toshiki Nagayama
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Aminergic control of social status in crayfish agonistic encounters.

Authors:  Yuto Momohara; Akihiro Kanai; Toshiki Nagayama
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Balancing risks and rewards: the logic of violence.

Authors:  Mark Broom
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-11-16       Impact factor: 3.558

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.