Literature DB >> 9642008

Functional referents and acoustic similarity: field playback experiments with rhesus monkeys.

.   

Abstract

Rhesus monkeys, Macaca mulatta, on the island of Cayo Santiago, Puerto Rico produce one or more of five acoustically distinctive calls when they find food. Three of these calls ('warbles', 'harmonic arches' and 'chirps') are produced by individuals finding high-quality, rare food items, whereas the other two calls ('coos' and 'grunts') are produced upon encountering lower-quality, common food items, and in non-food contexts as well. To determine how rhesus classify such acoustic variation, I conducted habituation experiments using a subset of the five call types. I designed experiments to reveal whether classification is based primarily on acoustic features or on the basis of a call's functional referent; caller identity was held constant within sessions. Habituation to 'warbles' transferred to 'harmonic arches', and vice versa. Thus, although these two calls are acoustically distinctive, they appeared to be perceptually clustered into one category based on referential similarities. In contrast, habituation to 'grunts' was followed by dishabituation to 'warbles' or 'harmonic arches', and habituation to 'warbles' or 'harmonic arches' was followed by dishabituation to 'grunts'. Dishabituation could be due to acoustic or referential differences. Significantly, the magnitude of the dishabituating response was asymmetric and depended upon the call type used in the habituation series. Thus, when subjects were habituated to 'grunts', they responded significantly more to tests of 'warbles' or 'harmonic arches' than when the sequence was reversed. These results suggest that for rhesus monkey food-associated calls, referential differences carry more weight during perceptual classification than do acoustical differences. Copyright 1998 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour. Copyright 1998 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.

Entities:  

Year:  1998        PMID: 9642008     DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1997.0712

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Behav        ISSN: 0003-3472            Impact factor:   2.844


  38 in total

1.  Interspecies semantic communication in two forest primates.

Authors:  K Zuberbühler
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-04-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Meaning in the avian auditory cortex: neural representation of communication calls.

Authors:  Julie E Elie; Frédéric E Theunissen
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.386

3.  Spatial and non-spatial auditory processing in the lateral intraparietal area.

Authors:  Gordon W Gifford; Yale E Cohen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-03-15       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Spontaneous processing of abstract categorical information in the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Yale E Cohen; Marc D Hauser; Brian E Russ
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2006-06-22       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  Chimpanzees Differentially Produce Novel Vocalizations to Capture the Attention of a Human.

Authors:  William D Hopkins; Jared Taglialatela; David A Leavens
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.844

6.  Using PET H2O15 brain imaging to study the functional-anatomical correlates of non-human primate communication.

Authors:  Ricardo Gil-da-Costa; Allen Braun; Alex Martin
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.608

Review 7.  Representation and integration of auditory and visual stimuli in the primate ventral lateral prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Lizabeth M Romanski
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2007-07-18       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Coding of auditory-stimulus identity in the auditory non-spatial processing stream.

Authors:  Brian E Russ; Ashlee L Ackelson; Allison E Baker; Yale E Cohen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-11-14       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Syllable acoustics, temporal patterns, and call composition vary with behavioral context in Mexican free-tailed bats.

Authors:  Kirsten M Bohn; Barbara Schmidt-French; Sean T Ma; George D Pollak
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Prefrontal neurons predict choices during an auditory same-different task.

Authors:  Brian E Russ; Lauren E Orr; Yale E Cohen
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2008-09-25       Impact factor: 10.834

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.