Literature DB >> 9641249

Electrophysiological evidence for the typicality effect of human cognitive categorization.

N Fujihara1, Y Nageishi, S Koyama, Y Nakajima.   

Abstract

Event-related brain potentials (ERPs) were recorded from 14 normal subjects during a category verification task. Stimulus words were selected from 17 semantic categories (e.g. 'vegetables'). Half of the words were typical category members (e.g. 'carrot', 'spinach') and the other half were atypical (e.g. 'parsley', 'asparagus'). Subjects were required to judge whether each stimulus belonged to a target category ('vegetables' or 'sports') or a non-target category. For the non-target category, the typicality effect was neither found in ERPs nor in reaction times. For the target category, typical words were responded to more quickly than were atypical words and the ERP amplitudes between a 300-450 ms period were more negative after the atypical words than after the typical words (typicality effect). These results suggested that typical words of the target were more primed by a target category than were the atypical words of the target and thus that a concept is represented by a prototype, the central tendency of all members of the category.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9641249     DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8760(97)00099-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol        ISSN: 0167-8760            Impact factor:   2.997


  13 in total

1.  How does typicality of category members affect the deductive reasoning? An ERP study.

Authors:  Yi Lei; Fuhong Li; Changquan Long; Peng Li; Qingfei Chen; Yuanyuan Ni; Hong Li
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-05-29       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  What's in a name? Brain activity reveals categorization processes differ across languages.

Authors:  Chao Liu; Twila Tardif; Xiaoqin Mai; William J Gehring; Nina Simms; Yue-Jia Luo
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Activating basic category exemplars in sentence contexts: a dynamical account.

Authors:  Joanna Raczaszek-Leonardi; Lewis P Shapiro; Betty Tuller; J A Scott Kelso
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2008-03

4.  The real-time link between person perception and action: brain potential evidence for dynamic continuity.

Authors:  Jonathan B Freeman; Nalini Ambady; Katherine J Midgley; Phillip J Holcomb
Journal:  Soc Neurosci       Date:  2010-07-02       Impact factor: 2.083

5.  Effect of typicality on online category verification of animate category exemplars in aphasia.

Authors:  Swathi Kiran; Cynthia K Thompson
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.381

6.  Understanding semantic and phonological processing deficits in adults with aphasia: Effects of category and typicality.

Authors:  Erin L Meier; Melody Lo; Swathi Kiran
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2015-09-12       Impact factor: 2.773

7.  Two-stage categorization in brand extension evaluation: electrophysiological time course evidence.

Authors:  Qingguo Ma; Cuicui Wang; Xiaoyi Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Categorization Method Affects the Typicality Effect: ERP Evidence from a Category-Inference Task.

Authors:  Xiaoxi Wang; Yun Tao; Tobias Tempel; Yuan Xu; Siqi Li; Yu Tian; Hong Li
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-02-17

9.  How types of premises modulate the typicality effect in category-based induction: diverging evidence from the P2, P3, and LPC effects.

Authors:  Xiuling Liang; Qingfei Chen; Yi Lei; Hong Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Effect of Working Memory Load and Typicality on Semantic Processing in Aphasia.

Authors:  Jessica Obermeyer; Laura Reinert; Rachel Kamen; Danielle Pritchard; Hyejin Park; Nadine Martin
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 4.018

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.