Literature DB >> 9641140

A comparison of amounts of apically extruded debris using handpiece-driven nickel-titanium instrument systems.

R E Hinrichs1, W A Walker, W G Schindler.   

Abstract

One hundred single-rooted teeth were instrumented with Lightspeed, Profile .04 Taper Series 29, and NT McXIM instruments according to the recommendations of the manufacturers, and Flex-R files using the balanced force technique. Groups were comparable with respect to average curvature, canal length, and major and minor foramen size. A standard amount of irrigant was used for each tooth. Apically extruded debris and irrigant were collected and weighed. Debris was desiccated before being weighed. There were no statistically significant differences among the four groups with respect to total extruded debris. The amount of extruded debris was positively correlated with the amount of irrigant extruded. Factors such as canal length, curvature, and foramen size did not affect the amount of debris extruded.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9641140     DOI: 10.1016/S0099-2399(98)80086-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endod        ISSN: 0099-2399            Impact factor:   4.171


  10 in total

1.  Apical debris extrusion associated with oval shaped canals: a comparative study of WaveOne vs Self-Adjusting File.

Authors:  Eleftherios Terry R Farmakis; G G Sotiropoulos; I Abràmovitz; M Solomonov
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Comparison of debris extruded apically and working time used by ProTaper Universal rotary and ProTaper retreatment system during gutta-percha removal.

Authors:  Mary Kinue Nakamune Uezu; Maria Leticia Borges Britto; Cleber K Nabeshima; Raul Capp Pallotta
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.698

3.  Postoperative endodontic pain of three different instrumentation techniques in asymptomatic necrotic mandibular molars with periapical lesion: a prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial.

Authors:  Ali Shokraneh; Majid Ajami; Nastaran Farhadi; Mohsen Hosseini; Bita Rohani
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Comparison of apical debris extrusion using a conventional and two rotary techniques.

Authors:  Alireza Adl; Safoora Sahebi; Fariborz Moazami; Mahnaz Niknam
Journal:  Iran Endod J       Date:  2009-10-10

5.  In Vitro Comparison of Apically Extruded Debris during Root Canal Preparation of Mandibular Premolars with Manual and Rotary Instruments.

Authors:  Sonal Soi; Suman Yadav; Sumeet Sharma; Mohit Sharma
Journal:  J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects       Date:  2015-09-16

6.  Comparison of Single Visit Post Endodontic Pain Using Mtwo Rotary and Hand K-File Instruments: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Mohamad Kashefinejad; Azade Harandi; Saeed Eram; Ali Bijani
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2016-01

7.  Impact of root canal curvature and instrument type on the amount of extruded debris during retreatment.

Authors:  Burcu Serefoglu; Gözde Kandemir Demirci; Seniha Miçooğulları Kurt; İlknur Kaşıkçı Bilgi; Mehmet Kemal Çalışkan
Journal:  Restor Dent Endod       Date:  2020-12-17

8.  Apical Extrusion of Debris after Canal Preparation with Hand-Files Used Manually or Installed on Reciprocating Air-Driven Handpiece in Straight and Curved Canals.

Authors:  Hossein Labbaf; Leila Shakeri; Reza Orduie; Farshid Bastami
Journal:  Iran Endod J       Date:  2015-07-01

9.  A Comparative Study on the Amount of Extruded Material from the Apical Foramen with NiTi Rotary and Stainless Steel Hand Instruments.

Authors:  Shahrzad Nazari; Farshid Mirmotalebi
Journal:  Iran Endod J       Date:  2006-07-01

10.  Quantifying the extruded bacteria following use of two rotary instrumentation systems.

Authors:  Zahed Mohammadi; Abbasali Khademi
Journal:  Iran Endod J       Date:  2007-10-02
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.