Literature DB >> 9640726

Teledermatology--high technology or not?

P V Harrison1, B Kirby, Y Dickinson, R Schofield.   

Abstract

As an alternative to attending a conventional dermatology clinic, patients had a high-resolution conventional photographic image taken by a professional medical photographer. The photographic images were viewed by a dermatologist together with referral details from the general practitioner and any other relevant information from the patient's notes. From the images, a dermatological diagnosis was derived and a management plan for each patient instituted. After treatment, histological assessment of the tumours allowed diagnostic accuracy to be determined. The preliminary diagnostic accuracy (71%) was greater than that of the referring general practitioners (49%). However, when the diagnostic ability of the method to detect the nature of malignant lesions was examined, telemedicine was able to detect malignancies in 94% of cases compared with only 70% detected by general practitioners. The results of the present study indicate that teledermatology is achievable using a low-technology, low-cost approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9640726     DOI: 10.1258/1357633981931344

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Telemed Telecare        ISSN: 1357-633X            Impact factor:   6.184


  2 in total

1.  [Teledermatology versus consultations--a comparative study of 120 consultations].

Authors:  F E Herrmann; K Sönnichsen; A Blum
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 0.751

2.  Teledermatology for diagnosing skin cancer in adults.

Authors:  Naomi Chuchu; Jacqueline Dinnes; Yemisi Takwoingi; Rubeta N Matin; Susan E Bayliss; Clare Davenport; Jacqueline F Moreau; Oliver Bassett; Kathie Godfrey; Colette O'Sullivan; Fiona M Walter; Richard Motley; Jonathan J Deeks; Hywel C Williams
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-12-04
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.