Literature DB >> 9639214

Occult anal sphincter trauma following randomized forceps and vacuum delivery.

A H Sultan1, R B Johanson, J E Carter.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of occult anal sphincter trauma 5 years after randomization to forceps and vacuum delivery.
METHOD: Anal endosonography and manometry was performed in 44 of 313 women who had originally participated in one center of the Keele University Multicenter Assisted Delivery Trial at the North Staffordshire Maternity Hospital between September 1989 and May 1990.
RESULTS: 50% admitted to defecatory symptoms and anal sphincter defects were identified in 61%. On the basis of intention to treat, 82% of forceps (n = 17) and 48% of vacuum deliveries (n = 27) had occult sphincter defects (P = 0.03). In four women, both instruments were used. However, the preponderance of defects in the forceps group persisted even when analysis was performed according to the final mode of delivery as well as in the group where only one instrument was used (n = 40). There was a significant fall in maximum squeeze anal pressure in the forceps group compared to the vacuum group (56 vs. 36 mmHg; P = 0.0007). Although twice as many in the forceps group suffered anal incontinence (32% vs. 16%) significance was not reached.
CONCLUSIONS: Vacuum delivery appears to be associated with less occult anal sphincter trauma than forceps delivery. A large prospective randomized study is required to address the impact of specific situations, such as failed instrumentation with use of a second instrument and rotational delivery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9639214     DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7292(98)00017-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet        ISSN: 0020-7292            Impact factor:   3.561


  8 in total

1.  Outcomes after vacuum-assisted deliveries. Births attended by community family practitioners.

Authors:  Colin Yarrow; Glenn Benoit; Michael C Klein
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  A systematic review of non-invasive modalities used to identify women with anal incontinence symptoms after childbirth.

Authors:  Thomas G Gray; Holly Vickers; Swati Jha; Georgina L Jones; Steven R Brown; Stephen C Radley
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-11-23       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 3.  Fecal incontinence: a review of prevalence and obstetric risk factors.

Authors:  Andrea Wang; Marsha Guess; Kathleen Connell; Kenneth Powers; George Lazarou; Magdy Mikhail
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2005-06-23

Review 4.  Pregnancy and postpartum bowel changes: constipation and fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Grace Hewon Shin; Erin Lucinda Toto; Ron Schey
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 5.  Instruments for assisted vaginal birth.

Authors:  Ganga L Verma; Jessica J Spalding; Marc D Wilkinson; G Justus Hofmeyr; Valerie Vannevel; Fidelma O'Mahony
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-09-24

6.  A modified surgical approach to women with obstetric anal sphincter tears by separate suturing of external and internal anal sphincter. A modified approach to obstetric anal sphincter injury.

Authors:  Pelle G Lindqvist; Mats Jernetz
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  Achieving sustainable quality in maternity services - using audit of incontinence and dyspareunia to identify shortfalls in meeting standards.

Authors:  James Clarkson; Cindy Newton; Debra Bick; Gill Gyte; Chris Kettle; Mary Newburn; Jane Radford; Richard Johanson
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  A retrospective study on perineal lacerations in vaginal delivery and the individual performance of experienced mifwives.

Authors:  Johannes Ott; Evelyn Gritsch; Sophie Pils; Sophie Kratschmar; Regina Promberger; Rudolf Seemann; Sabine Fürst; Dagmar Bancher-Todesca; Christa Hauser-Auzinger
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 3.007

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.