Literature DB >> 9638940

Identification of gel-separated proteins by liquid chromatography-electrospray tandem mass spectrometry: comparison of methods and their limitations.

P A Haynes1, N Fripp, R Aebersold.   

Abstract

We have compared several different experimental systems currently in use in our laboratory for protein identification by high performance liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-ESI-MS/MS) after sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). The efficiency of peptide recovery from trypsin-digested gel bands or electroblotted membrane slices was examined using 35S-labeled yeast proteins, and was found to be in excess of 80%. A dilution series of two standard proteins, bovine serum albumin (BSA) and carbonic anhydrase (CA), was analyzed by HPLC-ESI-MS/MS to determine what amount of protein could be loaded onto a gel and successfully identified, a measure we refer to as the practical detection limit. We were able to identify both standards at the 500 ng level in samples prepared from gel slices, using either a regular spray or a flow-split microspray HPLC-MS interface system. In samples prepared from membrane pieces, carbonic anhydrase was also identified at the 500 ng level, while bovine serum albumin could only be identified in samples of more than 1000 ng. In general, protein identification was slightly better in samples prepared from gels rather than membranes. A dilution series of lesser amounts of the same standard proteins was also analyzed using a gradient capillary LC system and we were able to successfully identify 50 ng of carbonic anhydrase and 100 ng of BSA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9638940     DOI: 10.1002/elps.1150190609

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electrophoresis        ISSN: 0173-0835            Impact factor:   3.535


  7 in total

1.  Qscore: an algorithm for evaluating SEQUEST database search results.

Authors:  Roger E Moore; Mary K Young; Terry D Lee
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.109

2.  Proteomic characterization of the small subunit of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii chloroplast ribosome: identification of a novel S1 domain-containing protein and unusually large orthologs of bacterial S2, S3, and S5.

Authors:  Kenichi Yamaguchi; Susana Prieto; María Verónica Beligni; Paul A Haynes; W Hayes McDonald; John R Yates; Stephen P Mayfield
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 11.277

3.  Performance comparisons of nano-LC systems, electrospray sources and LC-MS-MS platforms.

Authors:  Qian Liu; Jennifer S Cobb; Joshua L Johnson; Qi Wang; Jeffrey N Agar
Journal:  J Chromatogr Sci       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 1.618

4.  Acetylation directs survivin nuclear localization to repress STAT3 oncogenic activity.

Authors:  Haijuan Wang; Michael P Holloway; Li Ma; Zachary A Cooper; Matthew Riolo; Ayman Samkari; Kojo S J Elenitoba-Johnson; Y Eugene Chin; Rachel A Altura
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Proteomic survey of metabolic pathways in rice.

Authors:  Antonius Koller; Michael P Washburn; B Markus Lange; Nancy L Andon; Cosmin Deciu; Paul A Haynes; Lara Hays; David Schieltz; Ryan Ulaszek; Jing Wei; Dirk Wolters; John R Yates
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-08-05       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Investigative proteomics: identification of an unknown plant virus from infected plants using mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Bret Cooper; Donna Eckert; Nancy L Andon; John R Yates; Paul A Haynes
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.109

7.  Histological and MS spectrometric analyses of the modified tissue of bulgy form tadpoles induced by salamander predation.

Authors:  Tsukasa Mori; Yoichiro Kitani; Jun Ogihara; Manabu Sugiyama; Goshi Yamamoto; Osamu Kishida; Kinya Nishimura
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 2.422

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.