Literature DB >> 9637237

Repair of DNA damage in mammalian cells after treatment with UV and dimethyl sulphate: discrimination between nucleotide and base excision repair by their temperature dependence.

M Hjertvik1, K Erixon, G Ahnström.   

Abstract

Alkylating agents have been reported to give rise to both short and long patches of repair. The reason for the different patch sizes is not known. One possibility is that alkylating agents can trigger both base and nucleotide excision repair. Another possibility is that base excision repair itself can result in different patch sizes. Recognition and incision at lesions is the rate limiting step in excision repair. In order to discriminate between base and nucleotide excision repair it would be desirable to be able to distinguish between different incision activities. In order to accurately measure incision rates, the rejoining of the strand-breaks formed must be inhibited. We have used two inhibitors, aphidicolin and 3-aminobenzamide. Aphidicolin, an inhibitor of DNA polymerases alpha/delta/epsilon. caused accumulation of single-strand breaks both after UV and dimethylsulphate. 3-Aminobenzamide, an inhibitor of poly(ADP-ribose)-polymerase caused accumulation of single-strand breaks only after alkylating agents and is thus specific for base excision repair. Enzymatic activities can be characterised by their activation energy. In order to discriminate between base and nucleotide excision repair the temperature dependence of incision activities was determined. When the temperature is decreased, the incision rate is reduced to a larger extent for UV than for DMS-induced repair. Incisions in UV-irradiated cells are practically cut off at temperatures of 15 degrees C and below, whereas DMS-exposed cells still are actively repairing at this temperature. In DMS treated cells the temperature dependence was the same whether aphidicolin or 3-aminobenzamide was used, speaking against an involvement of nucleotide excision repair. In addition, cell lines deficient in nucleotide excision repair responded in the same way to aphidicolin after DMS treatment as normal cells and were able to make incisions at 15 degrees C. This indicates that nucleotide excision repair is not to any significant amount involved in repair of DNA damage induced by a methylating agent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9637237     DOI: 10.1016/s0921-8777(97)00062-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  4 in total

1.  The tumor suppressor p53 can both stimulate and inhibit ultraviolet light-induced apoptosis.

Authors:  B C McKay; F Chen; C R Perumalswami; F Zhang; M Ljungman
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.138

2.  DNA polymerase beta is required for efficient DNA strand break repair induced by methyl methanesulfonate but not by hydrogen peroxide.

Authors:  P Fortini; B Pascucci; F Belisario; E Dogliotti
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-08-15       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Rapid method for determination of DNA repair capacity in human peripheral blood lymphocytes amongst smokers.

Authors:  Randa A El-Zein; Claudia M Monroy; Andrea Cortes; Margaret R Spitz; Anthony Greisinger; Carol J Etzel
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 4.430

4.  Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) is not involved in base excision repair but PARP inhibition traps a single-strand intermediate.

Authors:  Cecilia E Ström; Fredrik Johansson; Mathias Uhlén; Cristina Al-Khalili Szigyarto; Klaus Erixon; Thomas Helleday
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 16.971

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.