Literature DB >> 9637124

Fetal growth velocity in the prediction of intrauterine growth retardation in a low risk population.

P Owen1, K S Khan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether fetal growth velocity derived from two antenatal ultrasound measurements in the third trimester, 28 days apart, can identify infants born with anthropometric features of intrauterine growth retardation.
DESIGN: Prospective observational study.
SETTING: Department of obstetric ultrasound, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee.
SUBJECTS: Two hundred and seventy four low risk women participating in a longitudinal study of serial fortnightly ultrasound in pregnancy.
METHODS: Growth velocities of the fetal abdominal area and bi-parietal diameter were calculated from the third from last and last measurements prior to delivery. Receiver Operator Characteristics curves were employed to determine an optimal cutoff point for velocity to predict intrauterine malnourishment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Likelihood ratios for fetal abdominal area and bi-parietal diameter growth velocity in the prediction of growth retarded infants with skinfold thickness < 10th centile; ponderal index < 25th centile, or mid-arm circumference to occipito-frontal circumference ratio (MAC:OFC ratio) of less than -1 SD. A likelihood ratio of > 10 generates significant changes in the pre-test probability of growth retardation, whereas a likelihood ratio of 5 to 10 generates only moderate changes.
RESULTS: Fetal abdominal area velocity predicted growth retardation with likelihood ratio 10.4 (95% CI 3.9 to 26) for skinfold thickness; likelihood ratio 9.5 (95% CI 4.6 to 19) for ponderal index; a likelihood ratio 4.7 (2.3 to 8.4) for MAC:OFC. Bi-parietal diameter velocity predicted growth retardation with likelihood ratio 6.5 (95% CI 1.9 to 20) for skinfold thickness but did not predict low ponderal index or MAC:OFC ratio.
CONCLUSIONS: Fetal abdominal area velocity is useful in identifying infants with reduced skinfold thickness or low ponderal index. Prospective evaluation of serial ultrasound and velocity calculation in a selected population at increased risk of growth failure and a clearer understanding of the relative significance of the different neonatal anthropometric measures of impaired growth achievement is necessary before the estimation of growth velocity can be recommended in clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9637124     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1998.tb10155.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0306-5456


  5 in total

Review 1.  Individualized growth assessment: conceptual framework and practical implementation for the evaluation of fetal growth and neonatal growth outcome.

Authors:  Russell L Deter; Wesley Lee; Lami Yeo; Offer Erez; Uma Ramamurthy; Medha Naik; Roberto Romero
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  The use of angiogenic biomarkers in maternal blood to identify which SGA fetuses will require a preterm delivery and mothers who will develop pre-eclampsia.

Authors:  Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa; Roberto Romero; Amy E Whitten; Steven J Korzeniewski; Piya Chaemsaithong; Edgar Hernandez-Andrade; Lami Yeo; Sonia S Hassan
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2016

3.  Small Size at Birth or Abnormal Intrauterine Growth Trajectory: Which Matters More for Child Growth?

Authors:  Jennifer A Hutcheon; Geir W Jacobsen; Michael S Kramer; Marit Martinussen; Robert W Platt
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Quantifying low birth weight, preterm birth and small-for-gestational-age effects of malaria in pregnancy: a population cohort study.

Authors:  Marcus J Rijken; Alysha M De Livera; Sue J Lee; Machteld E Boel; Suthatsana Rungwilailaekhiri; Jacher Wiladphaingern; Moo Kho Paw; Mupawjay Pimanpanarak; Sasithon Pukrittayakamee; Julie A Simpson; François Nosten; Rose McGready
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Fetal weight projection model to define growth velocity and validation against pregnancy outcome in a cohort of serially scanned pregnancies.

Authors:  O Hugh; J Gardosi
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 8.678

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.