Literature DB >> 9636566

Renal function in primary liver transplant recipients receiving neoral (cyclosporine) versus prograf (tacrolimus).

D Van Buren1, J Payne, S Geevarghese, R MacDonell, W Chapman, J K Wright, J H Helderman, R Richie, C W Pinson.   

Abstract

Immunosuppressive efficacy of Neoral and Prograf following primary hepatic transplantation was comparable. Incidence of rejection episodes, infectious complications, hypertension, and postoperative diabetes mellitus was comparable. Although clinical use of both immunosuppressants was associated with early compromise in renal function, no progressive renal dysfunction was observed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9636566     DOI: 10.1016/s0041-1345(98)00289-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplant Proc        ISSN: 0041-1345            Impact factor:   1.066


  3 in total

1.  Multivariate regression analysis on early mortality after orthotopic liver transplantation.

Authors:  Ye-Ben Qian; Gui-Hua Cheng; Jie-Fu Huang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Liver transplantation in the UK.

Authors:  S R Bramhall; E Minford; B Gunson; J A Buckels
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Cyclosporin microemulsion (Neoral). A pharmacoeconomic review of its use compared with standard cyclosporin in renal and hepatic transplantation.

Authors:  A J Coukell; G L Plosker
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.981

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.