Literature DB >> 9636236

The interspecific mass-density relationship and plant geometry.

M Franco1, C K Kelly.   

Abstract

We present an a priori theoretical framework for the interspecific allometric relationship between stand mass and plant population density. Our model predicts a slope of -1/3 between the logarithm of stand mass and the logarithm of stand density, thus conflicting with a previously assumed slope of -1/2. Our model rests on a heuristic separation of resource-limited living mass and structural mass in the plant body. We point out that because of similar resource requirements among plants of different sizes, a nonzero plant mass-density slope is primarily defined by structural mass. Specifically, the slope is a result of (i) the physical size-dependent relationship between stem width and height, (ii) foliage-dependent demands of conductance, and (iii) the cumulative nature of structural mass. The data support our model, both when the potential sampling bias of taxonomic relatedness is accounted for and when it is not. Independent contrasts analyses show that observed relationships among variables are not significantly different from the assumptions made to build the model or from its a priori predictions. We note that the dependence of the plant mass-density slope on the functions of structural mass provides a cause for the difference from the zero slope found in the animal population mass-density relationship; for the most part, animals do not have a comparable cumulative tissue type.

Year:  1998        PMID: 9636236      PMCID: PMC22773          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.95.13.7830

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  1 in total

1.  Tree structures: deducing the principle of mechanical design.

Authors:  T A McMahon; R E Kronauer
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1976-07-07       Impact factor: 2.691

  1 in total
  6 in total

1.  Size symmetry of competition alters biomass-density relationships.

Authors:  Peter Stoll; Jacob Weiner; Helene Muller-Landau; Elke Müller; Toshihiko Hara
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Growth and hydraulic (not mechanical) constraints govern the scaling of tree height and mass.

Authors:  Karl J Niklas; Hanns-Christof Spatz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-10-25       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  A general quantitative theory of forest structure and dynamics.

Authors:  Geoffrey B West; Brian J Enquist; James H Brown
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-04-10       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Respiration hastens maturation and lowers yield in rice.

Authors:  V Sitaramam; R Bhate; P Kamalraj; S Pachapurkar
Journal:  Physiol Mol Biol Plants       Date:  2008-09-27

5.  Computational identification of genes modulating stem height-diameter allometry.

Authors:  Libo Jiang; Meixia Ye; Sheng Zhu; Yi Zhai; Meng Xu; Minren Huang; Rongling Wu
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 9.803

6.  A meta-analysis shows that seaweeds surpass plants, setting life-on-Earth's limit for biomass packing.

Authors:  Joel C Creed; Vasco M N C S Vieira; Trevor A Norton; Debora Caetano
Journal:  BMC Ecol       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 2.964

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.