Literature DB >> 9635845

Tissue carcinoembryonic antigen and oestrogen receptor status in breast carcinoma: an immunohistochemical study of clinical outcome in a series of 252 patients with long-term follow-up.

F A Mauri1, O Caffo, S Veronese, P Verderio, P Boracchi, M Bonzanini, N Rossi, G Perrone, P Dalla Palma, M Barbareschi.   

Abstract

Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is a well-known tumour marker whose immunohistochemical expression could be prognostically relevant in breast carcinomas. We evaluated CEA immunohistochemical expression, using the specific T84.66 monoclonal antibody, in a series of 252 consecutive cases of infiltrating breast carcinomas (104 N0, 148 N1/2) with median follow-up of 84 months. Oestrogen receptor (ER) status has been evaluated with the immunohistochemical method (ER1D5 antibody, 10% cut-off value): 121 cases were ER negative, 128 cases were ER positive and in three cases ER status was unknown. CEA staining was cytoplasmic; staining intensity and percentage of reacting cells were combined to obtain a final score (CEA score). The difference between the distribution of CEA score within the modalities of the other variables was not statistically significant. Univariate survival analysis has been performed on the series of node-negative and node-positive patients. In the latter subgroup, this has been performed separately for patients treated with systemic adjuvant hormonal therapy or chemotherapy. A multivariate analysis was only performed for node-positive patients treated with adjuvant therapy. CEA immunoreactivity was not prognostically relevant in any subset of analysed patients. The most important prognostic markers were nodal status and tumour size.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9635845      PMCID: PMC2150051          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1998.273

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  16 in total

1.  Flexible regression models with cubic splines.

Authors:  S Durrleman; R Simon
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Cloning of the genes for T84.66, an antibody that has a high specificity and affinity for carcinoembryonic antigen, and expression of chimeric human/mouse T84.66 genes in myeloma and Chinese hamster ovary cells.

Authors:  M Neumaier; L Shively; F S Chen; F J Gaida; C Ilgen; R J Paxton; J E Shively; A D Riggs
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1990-04-01       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  Expression of tumour markers CA50, CEA and TPA in female breast carcinoma as related to histopathological findings and survival.

Authors:  M Eskelinen; P Lipponen; K Syrjänen
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  1992 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.480

4.  Sensitivity and specificity of Gold types 1 to 5 anti-carcinoembryonic antigen monoclonal antibodies: immunohistologic characterization in colorectal cancer and normal tissues.

Authors:  J M Esteban; R Paxton; P Mehta; H Battifora; J E Shively
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 3.466

5.  Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up.

Authors:  C W Elston; I O Ellis
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 5.087

6.  The distribution of carcinoembryonic antigen in breast carcinoma. Diagnostic and prognostic implications.

Authors:  F P Kuhajda; L E Offutt; G Mendelsohn
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1983-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Prognostic relevance of carcinoembryonic antigen and estrogen receptor status in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  J M Esteban; B Felder; C Ahn; J F Simpson; H Battifora; J E Shively
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1994-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Carcinoembryonic antigen expression in stages I and II breast cancer: its relationship with clinicopathologic factors.

Authors:  A S Sundblad; E M Pellicer; L Ricci
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 3.466

9.  Quantitative analysis of mutant p53 protein in breast tumor cytosols and study of its association with other biochemical prognostic indicators in breast cancer.

Authors:  M A Levesque; E P Diamandis; H Yu; D J Sutherland
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.872

10.  Confirmation of a prognostic index in primary breast cancer.

Authors:  J H Todd; C Dowle; M R Williams; C W Elston; I O Ellis; C P Hinton; R W Blamey; J L Haybittle
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  5 in total

1.  Breast carcinoma metastasis to the lacrimal gland: Two case reports.

Authors:  Marie N Nickelsen; Sarah VON Holstein; Alastair B Hansen; Jan U Prause; Steffen Heegaard
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 2.967

2.  The expression of CD66a and possible roles in colorectal adenoma and adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Wan-Yi Kang; Wan-Tzu Chen; Ming-Tsang Wu; Chee-Yin Chai
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2006-12-02       Impact factor: 2.796

3.  Assessment of beta-catenin expression by immunohistochemistry in colorectal neoplasms and its role as an additional prognostic marker in colorectal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Indroneel Bhattacharya; Neepamanjari Barman; Moumita Maiti; Ranu Sarkar
Journal:  Med Pharm Rep       Date:  2019-07-31

4.  Role of the WNT/β-catenin/ZKSCAN3 Pathway in Regulating Chromosomal Instability in Colon Cancer Cell lines and Tissues.

Authors:  Young-Eun Cho; Jeong-Hee Kim; Young-Hyun Che; Yong-Jun Kim; Ji-Youn Sung; Yoon-Wha Kim; Bong-Geun Choe; Sun Lee; Jae-Hoon Park
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 6.208

5.  Immunohistochemical analysis of beta-catenin expression: a probable prognostic marker and potential therapeutic target in renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Ayan Kundu; Anway Sen; Shouvik Choudhury; Tapan Kumar Mandal; Debasish Guha; Sandeep Lahiry
Journal:  Med Pharm Rep       Date:  2021-01-29
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.