Literature DB >> 9635557

Propulsion technique and anaerobic work capacity in elite wheelchair athletes: cross-sectional analysis.

L H van der Woude1, W H Bakker, J W Elkhuizen, H E Veeger, T Gwinn.   

Abstract

Wheelchair sports and daily manual wheelchair propulsion are dominated by frequent short-term power demands. The purpose of the current cross-sectional study was to determine the variation in propulsion technique in association with sprint power production among elite wheelchair athletes. Therefore, 67 wheelchair athletes (different impairments; 17 female and 50 male athletes; age, 29.1+/-7 yr; body weight, 60.7+/-11.8 kg; training hours, 12.9+/-6.4 h x wk(-1); VO2 peak, 1.7+/-0.7 liter x min(-1); aerobic power output, 72.2+/-36.7 W) were studied during the World Championships and Games for the Disabled in Assen (1990) on propulsion technique and anaerobic work capacity in a 30-s sprint test on a computer controlled wheelchair ergometer. Mean power output (P30) (97+/-45.8 W; range, 8.3-195.3 W) and heart rate (158.6+/-23.6 b x min(-1)) were highly variable and seemed associated with impairment level: track athletes, classified in four different functional classes, showed a class-related P30 of 23, 68, 100, and 138 W for the male athletes (n=38). Sprint power relative to body weight varied between 0.36 W X kg BW(-1)+/-0.04 and 1.85 W X kg BW(-1)+/-0.43 for the different subject groups. Propulsion technique in terms of forces applied to the rim and timing showed significant differences between subject groups for the majority of parameters studied. Apart from the mediolateral force and the negative dip at the start of the push phase, the technique parameters were significantly related to power production. Fraction effective force, the ratio between the total force vector and the effective force applied to the hand rim, appeared low on average (especially for subjects with cerebral palsy and those with a high spinal lesion) but showed a significant correlation with power output (r=0.5). In general, propulsion technique parameters were related to both performance and functionality. The number of training hours showed a small but significant relation with peak power (r=0.31), peak torque (r=0.4), the amount of work per push (r=0.41) and the total force vector (r=0.31), stressing the role of training status, next to disability, as important mediating factor in both propulsion technique as well as performance capacity. No association between training hours and fraction effective force was seen. It can be concluded that propulsion technique and performance parameters are highly variable among wheelchair athletes. Also, propulsion technique is strongly associated with functionality and training hours and does clearly relate to performance. The current results on technique and performance and their possible causal relationship, but also with impairment and sports discipline, must be further substantiated in a longitudinal study design.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9635557     DOI: 10.1097/00002060-199805000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0894-9115            Impact factor:   2.159


  9 in total

Review 1.  Physiology of wheelchair racing in athletes with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Yagesh Bhambhani
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 2.  Wheelchair propulsion biomechanics: implications for wheelchair sports.

Authors:  Y Vanlandewijck; D Theisen; D Daly
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Wheelchair propulsion demands during outdoor community ambulation.

Authors:  Wendy J Hurd; Melissa M B Morrow; Kenton R Kaufman; Kai-Nan An
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2008-06-30       Impact factor: 2.368

Review 4.  Field-based physiological testing of wheelchair athletes.

Authors:  Victoria L Goosey-Tolfrey; Christof A Leicht
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 11.136

5.  The physiological and biomechanical effects of forwards and reverse sports wheelchair propulsion.

Authors:  Barry S Mason; John P Lenton; Victoria L Goosey-Tolfrey
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 1.985

6.  Aerobic capacity and peak power output of elite quadriplegic games players.

Authors:  V Goosey-Tolfrey; P Castle; N Webborn; T Abel
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2006-04-12       Impact factor: 13.800

7.  Influence of varying level terrain on wheelchair propulsion biomechanics.

Authors:  Wendy J Hurd; Melissa M B Morrow; Kenton R Kaufman; Kai-Nan An
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.159

8.  Evaluation of a standardized test protocol to measure wheelchair-specific anaerobic and aerobic exercise capacity in healthy novices on an instrumented roller ergometer.

Authors:  Rowie J F Janssen; Riemer J K Vegter; Han Houdijk; Lucas H V Van der Woude; Sonja de Groot
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 3.752

9.  Variability in bimanual wheelchair propulsion: consistency of two instrumented wheels during handrim wheelchair propulsion on a motor driven treadmill.

Authors:  Riemer J K Vegter; Claudine J Lamoth; Sonja de Groot; Dirkjan H E J Veeger; Lucas H V van der Woude
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 4.262

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.