Literature DB >> 9634971

Sensitivity and specificity of a screening questionnaire for dry eye.

N L Oden1, D E Lilienfeld, M A Lemp, J D Nelson, F Ederer.   

Abstract

We developed a Dry Eye Screening Questionnaire for the Dry Eye Epidemiology Projects (DEEP), a proposed large epidemiologic study. All persons who screen positive and a small sample of those who screen negative are to be invited for a diagnostic examination. Containing 19 questions, of which only 14 were used in the analysis, the questionnaire takes only a few minutes to administer on the telephone. To construct a discriminator function and thus a ROC curve, we used stepwise multiple regression on screening responses from a clinic series of 77 cases and 79 controls. Stepwise regression may incorporate into the predictor equation variables whose relation to the predicted is only accidental. Further, misclassification rates are underestimated by the resubstitution method, in which the proportion misclassified is obtained from the same dataset in which the discriminator function was fitted. To counter these problems, we randomly divided the data in half. We chose as predictors only those variables (Dry and Irritated) selected by stepwise regression in both data halves. We estimated unbiased misclassification rates using the unbiased test set method, in which the discriminator is fitted in one data half, and misclassification rates are calculated in the other half. Comparison of ROC curves arising from resubstitution and test set estimates indicates that resubstitution bias in misclassification rate estimation is negligible in our data. A resubstitution estimate made on the entire data is thus preferred. The resulting sensitivity/specificity values are reasonably high (e.g., 60%/94%), suggesting that the questionnaire will be a useful screening tool in the DEEP study. A second discriminator using the sum of all 14 responses is similar in its misclassification characteristics to the first discriminator. A second potentially significant error, arising from applying results from a clinical series to a general population, will be investigated as survey results in DEEP become available.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9634971     DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-5359-5_113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol        ISSN: 0065-2598            Impact factor:   2.622


  10 in total

Review 1.  The international workshop on meibomian gland dysfunction: report of the subcommittee on the epidemiology of, and associated risk factors for, MGD.

Authors:  Debra A Schaumberg; Jason J Nichols; Eric B Papas; Louis Tong; Miki Uchino; Kelly K Nichols
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 2.  Topical corticosteroids for dry eye.

Authors:  Su-Hsun Liu; Ian J Saldanha; Alison G Abraham; Thanitsara Rittiphairoj; Scott Hauswirth; Darren Gregory; Cristos Ifantides; Tianjing Li
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-10-21

Review 3.  Current Approach to Dry Eye Disease.

Authors:  Valéria Valim; Virginia Fernandes Moça Trevisani; Jacqueline Martins de Sousa; Verônica Silva Vilela; Rubens Belfort
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 8.667

4.  Development and validation of the impact of dry eye on everyday life (IDEEL) questionnaire, a patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measure for the assessment of the burden of dry eye on patients.

Authors:  Linda Abetz; Krithika Rajagopalan; Polyxane Mertzanis; Carolyn Begley; Rod Barnes; Robin Chalmers
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 3.186

5.  The Berkeley Dry Eye Flow Chart: A fast, functional screening instrument for contact lens-induced dryness.

Authors:  Andrew D Graham; Erika L Lundgrin; Meng C Lin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Association between dry eye symptoms and suicidal ideation in a Korean adult population.

Authors:  Sun-Bi Um; Hyungseon Yeom; Na Hyun Kim; Hyeon Chang Kim; Hyung Keun Lee; Il Suh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Impact of dry eye syndrome on vision-related quality of life in a non-clinic-based general population.

Authors:  Qihua Le; Xiaodong Zhou; Ling Ge; Liangcheng Wu; Jiaxu Hong; Jianjiang Xu
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-07-16       Impact factor: 2.209

8.  Comparison of the NEI-VFQ and OSDI questionnaires in patients with Sjögren's syndrome-related dry eye.

Authors:  Susan Vitale; Linda A Goodman; George F Reed; Janine A Smith
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2004-09-01       Impact factor: 3.186

9.  Accuracy of McMonnies Questionnaire as a Screening Tool for Chinese Ophthalmic Outpatients.

Authors:  Furong Tang; Jiwei Wang; Zheng Tang; Mei Kang; Qinglong Deng; Jinming Yu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The Effects of Lighting Problems on Eye Symptoms among Cleanroom Microscope Workers.

Authors:  Kuan-Han Lin; Chien-Chia Su; Yen-Yuan Chen; Po-Ching Chu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 3.390

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.