Literature DB >> 9634532

Sporadic imprinting defects in Prader-Willi syndrome and Angelman syndrome: implications for imprint-switch models, genetic counseling, and prenatal diagnosis.

K Buiting1, B Dittrich, S Gross, C Lich, C Färber, T Buchholz, E Smith, A Reis, J Bürger, M M Nöthen, U Barth-Witte, B Janssen, D Abeliovich, I Lerer, A M van den Ouweland, D J Halley, C Schrander-Stumpel, H Smeets, P Meinecke, S Malcolm, A Gardner, M Lalande, R D Nicholls, K Friend, A Schulze, G Matthijs, H Kokkonen, P Hilbert, L Van Maldergem, G Glover, P Carbonell, P Willems, G Gillessen-Kaesbach, B Horsthemke.   

Abstract

The Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) and the Angelman syndrome (AS) are caused by the loss of function of imprinted genes in proximal 15q. In approximately 2%-4% of patients, this loss of function is due to an imprinting defect. In some cases, the imprinting defect is the result of a parental imprint-switch failure caused by a microdeletion of the imprinting center (IC). Here we describe the molecular analysis of 13 PWS patients and 17 AS patients who have an imprinting defect but no IC deletion. Heteroduplex and partial sequence analysis did not reveal any point mutations of the known IC elements, either. Interestingly, all of these patients represent sporadic cases, and some share the paternal (PWS) or the maternal (AS) 15q11-q13 haplotype with an unaffected sib. In each of five PWS patients informative for the grandparental origin of the incorrectly imprinted chromosome region and four cases described elsewhere, the maternally imprinted paternal chromosome region was inherited from the paternal grandmother. This suggests that the grandmaternal imprint was not erased in the father's germ line. In seven informative AS patients reported here and in three previously reported patients, the paternally imprinted maternal chromosome region was inherited from either the maternal grandfather or the maternal grandmother. The latter finding is not compatible with an imprint-switch failure, but it suggests that a paternal imprint developed either in the maternal germ line or postzygotically. We conclude (1) that the incorrect imprint in non-IC-deletion cases is the result of a spontaneous prezygotic or postzygotic error, (2) that these cases have a low recurrence risk, and (3) that the paternal imprint may be the default imprint.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9634532      PMCID: PMC1377255          DOI: 10.1086/301935

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Genet        ISSN: 0002-9297            Impact factor:   11.025


  48 in total

1.  Tetranucleotide repeat polymorphism at the human aromatase cytochrome P-450 gene (CYP19).

Authors:  M H Polymeropoulos; H Xiao; D S Rath; C R Merril
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1991-01-11       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Isolation and chromosomal assignment of 100 highly informative human simple sequence repeat polymorphisms.

Authors:  T J Hudson; M Engelstein; M K Lee; E C Ho; M J Rubenfield; C P Adams; D E Housman; N C Dracopoli
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 5.736

3.  Epigenotype switching of imprintable loci in embryonic germ cells.

Authors:  T Tada; M Tada; K Hilton; S C Barton; T Sado; N Takagi; M A Surani
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 0.900

4.  Multiplex PCR of three dinucleotide repeats in the Prader-Willi/Angelman critical region (15q11-q13): molecular diagnosis and mechanism of uniparental disomy.

Authors:  A Mutirangura; F Greenberg; M G Butler; S Malcolm; R D Nicholls; A Chakravarti; D H Ledbetter
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 6.150

5.  Dinucleotide repeat polymorphism of D15S10 in the Prader-Willi chromosome region (PWCR).

Authors:  R Lindeman; S Kouts; T Woodage; A Smith; R J Trent
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1991-10-11       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Dinucleotide repeat polymorphism at the GABAA receptor alpha 5 (GABRA5) locus at chromosome 15q11-q13.

Authors:  K A Glatt; D Sinnett; M Lalande
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 6.150

7.  Dinucleotide repeat polymorphism at the GABAA receptor beta 3 (GABRB3) locus in the Angelman/Prader-Willi region (AS/PWS) of chromosome 15.

Authors:  A Mutirangura; S A Ledbetter; A Kuwano; A C Chinault; D H Ledbetter
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 6.150

8.  Dinucleotide repeat polymorphism at the D15S11 locus in the Angelman/Prader-Willi region (AS/PWS) of chromosome 15.

Authors:  A Mutirangura; A Kuwano; S A Ledbetter; A C Chinault; D H Ledbetter
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 6.150

9.  Small nuclear ribonucleoprotein polypeptide N (SNRPN), an expressed gene in the Prader-Willi syndrome critical region.

Authors:  T Ozçelik; S Leff; W Robinson; T Donlon; M Lalande; E Sanjines; A Schinzel; U Francke
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 38.330

10.  Molecular diagnosis of the Prader-Willi and Angelman syndromes by detection of parent-of-origin specific DNA methylation in 15q11-13.

Authors:  B Dittrich; W P Robinson; H Knoblauch; K Buiting; K Schmidt; G Gillessen-Kaesbach; B Horsthemke
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 4.132

View more
  31 in total

Review 1.  Genetics of Angelman syndrome.

Authors:  Y Jiang; E Lev-Lehman; J Bressler; T F Tsai; A L Beaudet
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Conserved characteristics of heterochromatin-forming DNA at the 15q11-q13 imprinting center.

Authors:  J M Greally; T A Gray; J M Gabriel; L Song; S Zemel; R D Nicholls
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-12-07       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  A 28-kb deletion spanning D15S63 (PW71) in five families: a rare neutral variant?

Authors:  K Buiting; B Dittrich; B Dworniczak; I Lerer; D Abeliovich; S Cottrell; I K Temple; J F Harvey; C Lich; S Gross; B Horsthemke
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 4.  Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome: imprinting in clusters revisited.

Authors:  E R Maher; W Reik
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 14.808

5.  Another case of imprinting defect in a girl with Angelman syndrome who was conceived by intracytoplasmic semen injection.

Authors:  K H Ørstavik; K Eiklid; C B van der Hagen; S Spetalen; K Kierulf; O Skjeldal; K Buiting
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Discordance between genetic and epigenetic defects in pseudohypoparathyroidism type 1b revealed by inconsistent loss of maternal imprinting at GNAS1.

Authors:  Suzanne Jan de Beur; Changlin Ding; Emily Germain-Lee; Justin Cho; Alexander Maret; Michael A Levine
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2003-07-11       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Epigenetics and assisted reproductive technology: a call for investigation.

Authors:  Emily L Niemitz; Andrew P Feinberg
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2004-02-27       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Identification and proteomic analysis of distinct UBE3A/E6AP protein complexes.

Authors:  Gustavo Martínez-Noël; Jeffrey T Galligan; Mathew E Sowa; Verena Arndt; Thomas M Overton; J Wade Harper; Peter M Howley
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 4.272

9.  Sudden cardiac death in a child affected by Prader-Willi syndrome.

Authors:  Cristoforo Pomara; Stefano D'Errico; Irene Riezzo; Gian Pio de Cillis; Vittorio Fineschi
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2005-03-05       Impact factor: 2.686

10.  Imprinting-mutation mechanisms in Prader-Willi syndrome.

Authors:  T Ohta; T A Gray; P K Rogan; K Buiting; J M Gabriel; S Saitoh; B Muralidhar; B Bilienska; M Krajewska-Walasek; D J Driscoll; B Horsthemke; M G Butler; R D Nicholls
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 11.025

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.