Literature DB >> 963418

Duodenoscopic papillotomy and gallstone removal.

P B Cotton, M Chapman, C G Whiteside, L P Le Quesne.   

Abstract

Using an experimental insulated duodenoscope and a diathermy wire, papillotomy has been performed on 10 patients under diazepam sedation. Seven patients had common bile duct stones (6 following cholecystectomy) and 3 had papillary stenosis. Nine of the patients had severe medical or surgical contraindications to further operative treatment. Papillotomy was successful in all patients, with no significant bleeding or other complications. Repeat endoscopy 6-14 days after papillotomy demonstrated a healed biliary orifice of 7-10 mm diameter. Stones had already passed in 3 of the 7 patients; in 2 others, stones were extracted using balloon catheters or Dormia type baskets. Two larger stones could not be removed; in one of these patients the stone and basket became impacted at the papilla and had to be removed surgically 2 days later. Endoscopic papillotomy is an acceptable alternative to surgery in high risk patients, particularly in the treatment of retained common bile duct stones. If long term results prove satisfactory, the technique will have wider application.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1976        PMID: 963418     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800630910

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  4 in total

1.  Evolution in the utilization of biliary interventions in the United States: results of a nationwide longitudinal study from 1998 to 2013.

Authors:  Robert J Huang; Nirav C Thosani; Monique T Barakat; Abhishek Choudhary; Alka Mithal; Gurkirpal Singh; Saurabh Sethi; Subhas Banerjee
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Removal of common bile duct stones after emergency drainage of the gall bladder.

Authors:  E M Walker; D H Rose
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 3.  Biliary tract diseases in the elderly: management and outcomes.

Authors:  J H Siegel; F E Kasmin
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  Problems in endoscopic sphincteropapillotomy.

Authors:  Y C Yang; J I Myeong; H S Yeo; H B Park
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 2.884

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.