Literature DB >> 9633666

The structure of psychosis: latent class analysis of probands from the Roscommon Family Study.

K S Kendler1, L M Karkowski, D Walsh.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The nosologic structure of psychotic illness, still influenced as much by historical as empirical perspectives, remains controversial.
METHODS: Latent class analysis was applied to detailed symptomatic and outcome assessments of probands (n=343) with broadly defined schizophrenia and affective illness ascertained from a population-based psychiatric registry in Roscommon County, Ireland. First-degree relatives (n=942) were assessed by personal interview and/or review of hospital record.
RESULTS: Six classes were found, all of which bore substantial resemblance to current or historical nosologic constructs. In order of decreasing frequency, they were (1) classic schizophrenia, (2) major depression, (3) schizophreniform disorder, (4) bipolar-schizomania, (5) schizodepression, and (6) hebephrenia. These classes differed on many historical and clinical variables not used in the latent class analysis. Compared with relatives of controls, significantly increased rates of major depression were seen in relatives of depressed and schizodepressed probands. Significantly increased rates of bipolar illness were restricted to relatives of bipolar-schizomanic probands. The risks for schizophrenia and schizophrenia spectrum disorders were significantly increased in relatives of all proband classes except major depression. This increase was moderate for bipolar-schizomanic probands, substantial for schizophrenic, schizophreniform, and schizodepressed probands, and marked for hebephrenic probands.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest a relatively complex typology of psychotic syndromes consistent neither with a unitary model nor with a Kraepelinian dichotomy. The familial vulnerability to psychosis extends across several syndromes, being most pronounced in those with schizophrenialike symptoms. The familial vulnerability to depressive and manic affective illness is somewhat more specific.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9633666     DOI: 10.1001/archpsyc.55.6.492

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry        ISSN: 0003-990X


  48 in total

Review 1.  Categorical vs dimensional classifications of psychotic disorders.

Authors:  Melissa Potuzak; Caitlin Ravichandran; Kathryn E Lewandowski; Dost Ongür; Bruce M Cohen
Journal:  Compr Psychiatry       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 3.735

2.  Variation and validation: the example of schizophrenia.

Authors:  Kenneth F Schaffner
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 49.548

3.  Rethinking psychosis: the disadvantages of a dichotomous classification now outweigh the advantages.

Authors:  Nick Craddock; Michael J Owen
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 49.548

4.  An application of item response mixture modelling to psychosis indicators in two large community samples.

Authors:  Mark Shevlin; Gary Adamson; Wilma Vollebergh; Ron de Graaf; Jim van Os
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 4.328

5.  Mobility limitations in persons with psychotic disorder: findings from a population-based survey.

Authors:  Satu Viertiö; Päivi Sainio; Seppo Koskinen; Jonna Perälä; Samuli I Saarni; Marja Sihvonen; Jouko Lönnqvist; Jaana Suvisaari
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2008-09-17       Impact factor: 4.328

Review 6.  Seeking verisimilitude in a class: a systematic review of evidence that the criterial clinical symptoms of schizophrenia are taxonic.

Authors:  Richard J Linscott; Judith Allardyce; Jim van Os
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 9.306

Review 7.  The genetics of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder: dissecting psychosis.

Authors:  N Craddock; M C O'Donovan; M J Owen
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 6.318

8.  Personality in relation to genetic liability for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder: differential associations with the COMT Val 108/158 Met polymorphism.

Authors:  Amy L Silberschmidt; Scott R Sponheim
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2008-01-16       Impact factor: 4.939

9.  Genetic utility of broadly defined bipolar schizoaffective disorder as a diagnostic concept.

Authors:  M L Hamshere; E K Green; I R Jones; L Jones; V Moskvina; G Kirov; D Grozeva; I Nikolov; D Vukcevic; S Caesar; K Gordon-Smith; C Fraser; E Russell; G Breen; D St Clair; D A Collier; A H Young; I N Ferrier; A Farmer; P McGuffin; P A Holmans; M J Owen; M C O'Donovan; N Craddock
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 9.319

10.  Does gene deletion of AMPA GluA1 phenocopy features of schizoaffective disorder?

Authors:  Paul J Fitzgerald; Chris Barkus; Michael Feyder; Lisa M Wiedholz; Yi-Chyan Chen; Rose-Marie Karlsson; Rodrigo Machado-Vieira; Carolyn Graybeal; Trevor Sharp; Carlos Zarate; Judith Harvey-White; Jing Du; Rolf Sprengel; Peter Gass; David Bannerman; Andrew Holmes
Journal:  Neurobiol Dis       Date:  2010-08-08       Impact factor: 5.996

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.