BACKGROUND: The indication for urgent cardiac surgical interventions in patients with active infective endocarditis has to be considered carefully following thromboembolic events, because of the high recurrence rate of such complications. In the case of brain embolisms the prognostic benefit of urgent surgery has been discussed controversially as effective anticoagulation during open heart surgery may result in secondary cerebral hemorrhages. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1978 and 1993 infective endocarditis (IE) was proven in 288 consecutive and prospectively followed patients (131 females, 157 males; mean age 53.6 +/- 8.7 [9 to 81] years). To analyze potential benefits and risks of an urgent surgical intervention early after embolic cerebral infarction, cumulated survival rates were calculated for patients with and without surgical intervention with special reference to incremental risk factors and the timing of surgery. RESULTS: In 50 patients (17.4%) the clinical course was complicated by one, and in 58 patients (20.2%) by recurrent embolic events. In 80% the first embolism occurred within 33 days following the first manifestation of typical signs and symptoms of IE. 80% of recurrent events were observed within 32 days following the initial embolism. 71% of all embolic events were cerebral. In patients with cerebral embolism corroborated by computed tomography (CCT), the clinical course was complicated by intracranial hemorrhage in 12.5% while it was only 1.5% for patients without cerebral embolism. Because of a lack of therapeutic alternatives, 22 of 49 patients with recurrent embolic events, of which at least one was cerebral, underwent urgent cardiac surgery within 4 to 366 hours after the first cerebral manifestation. The cumulated survival rate of patients operated within 72 hours after the initial cerebral embolism was significantly more favorable (p < or = 0.000) than for unoperated patients or those who were operated after more than 8 days. CONCLUSION: An embolic event during IE carries a more than 50% risk of recurrence. In patients with short duration of signs and symptoms of IE and postembolic echocardiographic demonstration of persistent vegetations the probability is > 80%. At least for those patients urgent surgical intervention to remove the source of infection and embolic hazard seems to be beneficial. Surgical intervention using the heart-lung-machine should be performed within 72 hours. Such early timing results in a significant lower rate of secondary cerebral hemorrhages (p < or = 0.00) than a postponed operation. To exclude early reperfusion hemorrhage due to spontaneous thrombus fragmentation, CCT should be repeated directly preoperatively.
BACKGROUND: The indication for urgent cardiac surgical interventions in patients with active infective endocarditis has to be considered carefully following thromboembolic events, because of the high recurrence rate of such complications. In the case of brain embolisms the prognostic benefit of urgent surgery has been discussed controversially as effective anticoagulation during open heart surgery may result in secondary cerebral hemorrhages. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1978 and 1993 infective endocarditis (IE) was proven in 288 consecutive and prospectively followed patients (131 females, 157 males; mean age 53.6 +/- 8.7 [9 to 81] years). To analyze potential benefits and risks of an urgent surgical intervention early after embolic cerebral infarction, cumulated survival rates were calculated for patients with and without surgical intervention with special reference to incremental risk factors and the timing of surgery. RESULTS: In 50 patients (17.4%) the clinical course was complicated by one, and in 58 patients (20.2%) by recurrent embolic events. In 80% the first embolism occurred within 33 days following the first manifestation of typical signs and symptoms of IE. 80% of recurrent events were observed within 32 days following the initial embolism. 71% of all embolic events were cerebral. In patients with cerebral embolism corroborated by computed tomography (CCT), the clinical course was complicated by intracranial hemorrhage in 12.5% while it was only 1.5% for patients without cerebral embolism. Because of a lack of therapeutic alternatives, 22 of 49 patients with recurrent embolic events, of which at least one was cerebral, underwent urgent cardiac surgery within 4 to 366 hours after the first cerebral manifestation. The cumulated survival rate of patients operated within 72 hours after the initial cerebral embolism was significantly more favorable (p < or = 0.000) than for unoperated patients or those who were operated after more than 8 days. CONCLUSION: An embolic event during IE carries a more than 50% risk of recurrence. In patients with short duration of signs and symptoms of IE and postembolic echocardiographic demonstration of persistent vegetations the probability is > 80%. At least for those patients urgent surgical intervention to remove the source of infection and embolic hazard seems to be beneficial. Surgical intervention using the heart-lung-machine should be performed within 72 hours. Such early timing results in a significant lower rate of secondary cerebral hemorrhages (p < or = 0.00) than a postponed operation. To exclude early reperfusion hemorrhage due to spontaneous thrombus fragmentation, CCT should be repeated directly preoperatively.