W T Jackson1, T A Novack, R N Dowler. 1. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 35294-0018, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To introduce a brief quantitative measure of cognitive orientation (to place, time, and situation) developed for daily use at bedside with rehabilitation inpatients. The Orientation Log (O-Log) is a 10-item scale that allows for partial credit based on responsiveness to logical, multiple-choice, or phonemic cueing. It is formatted for rapid visual analysis of orientation trends that can be used to evaluate pharmacologic and cognitive-behavioral interventions. DESIGN: Descriptive study of the O-Log's reliability (interrater and internal consistency). SETTING: Inpatient rehabilitation center affiliated with a large university medical school. PATIENTS: Fifteen neurorehabilitation inpatients. RESULTS: For individual items, Spearman rho interrater reliability coefficients ranged from .851 to 1.00. The interrater reliability of the total score was .993. O-Log internal consistency (coefficient alpha) was .922. CONCLUSIONS: The O-Log is a reliable and easily administered scale that promises to be a useful tool in monitoring cognitive recovery during rehabilitation.
OBJECTIVE: To introduce a brief quantitative measure of cognitive orientation (to place, time, and situation) developed for daily use at bedside with rehabilitation inpatients. The Orientation Log (O-Log) is a 10-item scale that allows for partial credit based on responsiveness to logical, multiple-choice, or phonemic cueing. It is formatted for rapid visual analysis of orientation trends that can be used to evaluate pharmacologic and cognitive-behavioral interventions. DESIGN: Descriptive study of the O-Log's reliability (interrater and internal consistency). SETTING: Inpatient rehabilitation center affiliated with a large university medical school. PATIENTS: Fifteen neurorehabilitation inpatients. RESULTS: For individual items, Spearman rho interrater reliability coefficients ranged from .851 to 1.00. The interrater reliability of the total score was .993. O-Log internal consistency (coefficient alpha) was .922. CONCLUSIONS: The O-Log is a reliable and easily administered scale that promises to be a useful tool in monitoring cognitive recovery during rehabilitation.
Authors: Jeffrey B Ware; Tessa Hart; John Whyte; Amanda Rabinowitz; John A Detre; Junghoon Kim Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2017-05-03 Impact factor: 5.269
Authors: M Salam; S Matherly; I S Farooq; R T Stravitz; R K Sterling; A J Sanyal; D P Gibson; J B Wade; L R Thacker; D M Heuman; M Fuchs; P Puri; V Luketic; S J Bickston; J S Bajaj Journal: Aliment Pharmacol Ther Date: 2012-02-21 Impact factor: 8.171
Authors: Stephen S Humble; Laura D Wilson; Li Wang; Drew A Long; Miya A Smith; Jonathan C Siktberg; Mina F Mirhoseini; Aashim Bhatia; Sumit Pruthi; Matthew A Day; Susanne Muehlschlegel; Mayur B Patel Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2018-07 Impact factor: 3.313
Authors: R L Tate; A Pfaff; I J Baguley; J E Marosszeky; J A Gurka; A E Hodgkinson; C King; A T Lane-Brown; J Hanna Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 2006-03-30 Impact factor: 10.154
Authors: Noelle E Carlozzi; Nicholas R Boileau; Elizabeth A Hahn; Stacey K Barton; David Cella; Michael K McCormack; Rebecca E Ready Journal: J Huntingtons Dis Date: 2020