Literature DB >> 9630130

Does practice make perfect? Examining the relationship between hospital surgical volume and outcomes for hip fracture patients in Quebec.

B H Hamilton1, V Ho.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Most tests of the practice-makes-perfect hypothesis have used cross-sectional data, which reveal that patients receiving surgery in high-volume hospitals tend to experience better postsurgery outcomes. This study uses longitudinal data to explicitly examine whether any given hospital's patient outcomes change as its surgery volume varies with time.
METHODS: Longitudinal data from all hospitals conducting hip fracture surgery in Quebec between 1990 and 1993 were used to examine the relationship between surgery volume and outcomes. The longitudinal data allowed volume to be measured using the actual number of surgeries performed by the admitting hospital in the 12 months before a patient's surgery. Determinants of postsurgery length of stay were assessed using ordinary least squares regression, and the explanators of inpatient mortality were identified using logistic regression. The regressions included fixed effects (hospital-specific dummy variables) to control for systematic differences in outcomes across hospitals that persist with time. Therefore, the coefficient on hip fracture surgery volume in the regression models captured differences in outcomes that were attributable to changes in surgery volume within hospitals with time.
RESULTS: The fixed effects were significant explanators of both postsurgery length of stay and inpatient mortality, indicating that there were significant differences in outcomes across hospitals that persisted with time. In regressions that excluded the fixed effects, the coefficient on surgery volume was significant. In contrast, the coefficient on surgery volume was insignificant when the fixed effects were included.
CONCLUSIONS: Longitudinal data revealed that after controlling for differences in hospital outcomes that were fixed with time, hospitals performing more surgeries in one period than in another experienced no significant improvement in outcomes. These results do not support the "practice makes perfect" hypothesis. The volume-outcome relationship for hip fracture patients thus appears to reflect fixed differences in quality between high-volume and low-volume hospitals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9630130     DOI: 10.1097/00005650-199806000-00012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  9 in total

1.  Risk factors correlated with post-operative mortality for hip fracture surgery in the elderly: a population-based approach.

Authors:  Antonella Franzo; Carlo Francescutti; Giorgio Simon
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 8.082

2.  The trends in treatment of femoral neck fractures in the Medicare population from 1991 to 2008.

Authors:  Benjamin J Miller; Xin Lu; Peter Cram
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Outcomes in pediatric surgery by hospital volume: a population-based comparison.

Authors:  Cabrini A LaRiviere; Jarod P McAteer; Jorge A Huaco; Michelle M Garrison; Jeffrey R Avansino; Thomas D Koepsell; Keith T Oldham; Adam B Goldin
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 1.827

4.  Modeling the volume-effectiveness relationship in the case of hip fracture treatment in Finland.

Authors:  Reijo Sund
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  Using G-computation to estimate the effect of regionalization of surgical services on the absolute reduction in the occurrence of adverse patient outcomes.

Authors:  Peter C Austin; David R Urbach
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Hospital case volume and outcomes for proximal femoral fractures in the USA: an observational study.

Authors:  David Metcalfe; Ali Salim; Olubode Olufajo; Belinda Gabbe; Cheryl Zogg; Mitchel B Harris; Daniel C Perry; Matthew L Costa
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 7.  A systematic review of the impact of center volume in dialysis.

Authors:  Dawid Pieper; Tim Mathes; Mark Roger Marshall
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2015-12-22

8.  Safety climate and readiness for implementation of evidence and person centered practice - A national study of registered nurses in general surgical care at Swedish university hospitals.

Authors:  Camilla Olsson; Anna Forsberg; Kristofer Bjerså
Journal:  BMC Nurs       Date:  2016-09-13

9.  The volume-outcome relationship for hip fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 2,023,469 patients.

Authors:  Eveline J A Wiegers; Charlie A Sewalt; Esmee Venema; Niels W L Schep; Jan A N Verhaar; Hester F Lingsma; Dennis Den Hartog
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 3.717

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.