Literature DB >> 9629818

Can non-prosecutory enforcement of public health legislation reduce smoking among high school students?

M Staff1, L March, A Brnabic, K Hort, J Alcock, S Coles, R Baxter.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Smoking by adolescents has been identified as a major public health issue. Raising the legal age of cigarette purchase from 16 to 18 years has attempted to address the issue by restricting adolescents' access. METHODS/STRATEGY: A prospective study evaluating the impact of non-prosecutory enforcement of public health legislation involving 'beat police' was conducted in the Northern Sydney Health region. Secondary students, aged 12 to 17 years, from both intervention and control regions were surveyed about cigarette smoking habits by means of a self-completed questionnaire administered pre- and post-intervention.
RESULTS: 12,502 anonymous questionnaires were completed. At baseline, 19.3% of male students and 21.2% of female students indicated they were current smokers. Age and sex stratified chi-squared analysis revealed significantly lower post-intervention smoking prevalence for year 8 and 10 females and year 7 males among the intervention group. Higher post-intervention smoking prevalences were demonstrated for year 7 and 9 females and year 8 males among the intervention group and in year 10 males and year 11 females among the control group. The analysis of combined baseline and follow-up data from coeducational schools with logistic regression techniques demonstrated that the intervention had a significant effect in reducing smoking prevalence among year 7 students only (OR = 0.54).
CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates the difficulties in restricting high school students' access to cigarettes. Isolated non-prosecutory strategies are likely to only have a limited impact on reducing smoking prevalence among high school students.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9629818     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-842x.1998.tb01387.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust N Z J Public Health        ISSN: 1326-0200            Impact factor:   2.939


  6 in total

1.  Youth tobacco access: adult attitudes, awareness, and perceived self-efficacy in two Arizona counties.

Authors:  Jason T Siegel; Eusebio M Alvaro
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2003-12

2.  Research opportunities concerning youth and the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act.

Authors:  Joseph R DiFranza
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 4.244

Review 3.  A systematic review of interventions for preventing tobacco sales to minors.

Authors:  L F Stead; T Lancaster
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 4.  Impact of the WHO FCTC over the first decade: a global evidence review prepared for the Impact Assessment Expert Group.

Authors:  Janet Chung-Hall; Lorraine Craig; Shannon Gravely; Natalie Sansone; Geoffrey T Fong
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 7.552

5.  Enforcement of underage sales laws as a predictor of daily smoking among adolescents: a national study.

Authors:  Joseph R DiFranza; Judith A Savageau; Kenneth E Fletcher
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-04-17       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 6.  Population tobacco control interventions and their effects on social inequalities in smoking: systematic review.

Authors:  S Thomas; D Fayter; K Misso; D Ogilvie; M Petticrew; A Sowden; M Whitehead; G Worthy
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2008-04-21       Impact factor: 7.552

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.