Literature DB >> 9629112

Defining the physician's duty to warn: consensus statement of Ontario's Medical Expert Panel on Duty to Inform.

L E Ferris1, H Barkun, J Carlisle, B Hoffman, C Katz, M Silverman.   

Abstract

Ontario's Medical Expert Panel on Duty to Inform was formed to consider the duty of Ontario physicians in circumstances where a patient threatens to kill or cause serious bodily harm to a third party. The panel was concerned about the implications of any duty to inform on the integrity of the physician-patient relationship, particularly with respect to confidentiality. The panel agreed that regulations safeguarding the confidentiality of patient information ought to be changed only if there is a critical reason for doing so, but, after deliberation, the panel members concluded that the need to protect the public from serious risk of harm is a paramount concern that should supersede the duty of confidentiality. The recommendations reported here were endorsed in principle by the panelists and the groups they represented (the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, the Canadian Medical Protective Association, the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario, the Ontario College of Family Physicians and the Ontario Medical Association) and are being implemented by the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Canadian Medical Protective Association; College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario; Legal Approach; Mental Health Therapies; Ontario College of Family Physicians; Ontario Medical Association; Ontario's Medical Expert Panel on Duty to Inform; Professional Patient Relationship; Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada; Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9629112      PMCID: PMC1229377     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  18 in total

1.  Violent patients and the Tarasoff duty in private psychiatric practice.

Authors:  James C Beck
Journal:  J Psychiatry Law       Date:  1985 Fall-Winter

2.  The evolution of Tarasoff: recent developments in the psychiatrist's duties to warn potential victims, protect the public, and predict dangerousness.

Authors:  Linn Turner Greenberg
Journal:  J Psychiatry Law       Date:  1984

Review 3.  Risk assessments for acute violence to third parties: a review of the literature.

Authors:  L E Ferris; J Sandercock; B Hoffman; M Silverman; H Barkun; J Carlisle; C Katz
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.356

4.  Statutory approaches to limiting psychiatrists' liability for their patients' violent acts.

Authors:  P S Appelbaum; H Zonana; R Bonnie; L H Roth
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 18.112

5.  Tarasoff decision: a decade later dilemma still faces psychotherapists.

Authors:  E J Kermani; S L Drob
Journal:  Am J Psychother       Date:  1987-04

6.  The new preventive detention: psychiatry's problematic responsibility for the control of violence.

Authors:  P S Appelbaum
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 18.112

7.  Tarasoff and the clinician: problems in fulfilling the duty to protect.

Authors:  P S Appelbaum
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 18.112

8.  Confidentiality and dangerousness in the doctor-patient relationship. The position of the Canadian Psychiatric Association.

Authors:  F Shane
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 4.356

9.  Anatomy of a second generation Tarasoff case.

Authors:  D L Goldman; T Jacob
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 4.356

10.  Legal issues in medical management of violent and threatening patients.

Authors:  B M Dickens
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 4.356

View more
  7 in total

1.  Understanding the effect of domestic violence on pregnancy, labour, and delivery.

Authors:  B Lent; P Morris; S Rechner
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Reporting intoxicated drivers.

Authors:  P G Winkelaar
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  The CMA's Health Information Privacy Code: does it go too far?

Authors:  J Hoey
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1998-10-20       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Protecting the public from risk of harm.

Authors:  L E Ferris
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-04-04

Review 5.  Addressing intimate partner violence with male patients: a review and introduction of pilot guidelines.

Authors:  Leigh S Kimberg
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Ethical Dilemma and Management of Infertility in HIV Seropositive Discordant Couples: A Case Study in Nigeria.

Authors:  Ouj Umeora; Fn Chukwuneke
Journal:  Ann Med Health Sci Res       Date:  2013-01

7.  Correlation Between Malpractice Litigation and Legislation Reform in Taiwan Over a 30-Year Period.

Authors:  Ming-Ta Hsieh; Li-Hui Lu; Chi-Wei Lin; Yun-Wen Chen
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2021-05-17
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.