Literature DB >> 9628607

Buckling of cylinders may cause prolonged penile pain after prosthesis implantation: a case control study using magnetic resonance imaging of the penis.

I Moncada1, C Hernández, J Jara, L Hernández, J Lafuente, E Lledó, E Rodriguez, I S de Tejada.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We identify risk factors associated with chronic postoperative penile pain after inflatable prosthesis insertion.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a case control study to determine the incidence of prolonged penile pain in 65 men who underwent prosthesis insertion. The association of various potential risk factors, including diabetes mellitus, incision site, prosthesis type, patient age and history of pelvic surgery, was assessed. In addition, the penis was examined for physical findings, and penile magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was done as an in situ evaluation of the anatomical position and functional status of the inflatable prosthesis.
RESULTS: A total of 14 patients (21.5%) with prolonged pain were compared to the remaining 51 with no pain. All parameters evaluated were similar in both groups except for MRI findings. Of the 14 patients with pain 12 (85.7%) had buckling of the cylinders in the flaccid state compared to only 1 of the 51 controls (1.9%). Statistical analysis showed a highly significant association between buckling and penile pain (odds ratio 300, p <0.0001). Surgical correction of buckling resolved pain in 5 patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged postoperative penile pain after prosthesis insertion is strongly associated with cylinder buckling. This buckling may be the consequence of an excessively long cylinder or an appropriate size cylinder that fails to reach the crural end. The method of accurately diagnosing these alterations is MRI of the penis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9628607

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  7 in total

Review 1.  Radiological assessment of penile prosthesis: the role of magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Ignacio Moncada; José Jara; Ramiro Cabello; Juan Ignacio Monzo; Carlos Hernández
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2004-10-30       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  The role of penile prosthetic surgery in the modern management of erectile dysfunction.

Authors:  S Jain; A Bhojwani; T R Terry
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.401

3.  Stresses in the normal and diabetic human penis following implantation of an inflatable prosthesis.

Authors:  A Gefen; J Chen; D Elad
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  MRI of the penis.

Authors:  A Kirkham
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Chronic pain associated with penile prostheses may persist despite revision or explantation.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Campbell; Ernest Pang Chan; Andrew Di Pierdominico; Serkan Karakus; Bruce Trock; Gerald B Brock; Arthur L Burnett
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 6.  Current use of penile implants in erectile dysfunction.

Authors:  John J Mulcahy; Steven K Wilson
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.862

7.  Penile prosthesis: what should we do about complications?

Authors:  C Bettocchi; P Ditonno; F Palumbo; G Lucarelli; G Garaffa; B Giammusso; M Battaglia
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2008-11-04
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.