Literature DB >> 9628523

Evaluation of genetic variability and genetic distances between eight chicken lines using microsatellite markers.

T Vanhala1, M Tuiskula-Haavisto, K Elo, J Vilkki, A Mäki-Tanila.   

Abstract

The genetic variability and divergence of eight chicken lines were evaluated using nine microsatellite markers. The chicken lines included three White Leghorn hybrids, three Finnish Landrace lines, a Rhode Island Red line, and a broiler hybrid line. All the microsatellite loci were found to be polymorphic, the number of alleles varying from 4 to 13 per locus and 1 to 10 per line, respectively. Observed heterozygosities ranged from 0.00 to 0.91. The highest (0.67) and lowest (0.29) mean heterozygosity per line was observed in the broiler and in White Leghorn of Mäkelä, respectively. Three of the microsatellite loci deviated from the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium in some populations. F statistics indicated clearly the subdivision of the total population into different lines. The genetic distances confirmed the classification of Finnish Landraces into different lines. A phylogenetic consensus tree was constructed from resampled data (1,000 times) using the neighbor-joining method. According to the phylogenetic tree, the lines were grouped into three clusters, in which the White Leghorns formed one group, two Landraces a second group, and a Landrace, the Rhode Island Red, and the broiler lines a third group. Allele distribution at the loci does not support either the stepwise or the infinite alleles mutation model, but the distribution pattern was quite irregular at different loci.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9628523     DOI: 10.1093/ps/77.6.783

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Poult Sci        ISSN: 0032-5791            Impact factor:   3.352


  7 in total

1.  Empirical evaluation of genetic clustering methods using multilocus genotypes from 20 chicken breeds.

Authors:  N A Rosenberg; T Burke; K Elo; M W Feldman; P J Freidlin; M A Groenen; J Hillel; A Mäki-Tanila; M Tixier-Boichard; A Vignal; K Wimmers; S Weigend
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Applicability of anatid and galliform microsatellite markers to the genetic diversity studies of domestic geese (Anser anser domesticus) through the genotyping of the endangered zatorska breed.

Authors:  Krzysztof Andres; Ewa Kapkowska
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2011-03-16

3.  Population structure of four Thai indigenous chicken breeds.

Authors:  Supamit Mekchay; Pantaporn Supakankul; Anunchai Assawamakin; Alisa Wilantho; Wanwisa Chareanchim; Sissades Tongsima
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 2.797

4.  Development of Microsatellite Marker System to Determine the Genetic Diversity of Experimental Chicken, Duck, Goose, and Pigeon Populations.

Authors:  Xiulin Zhang; Yang He; Wei Zhang; Yining Wang; Xinmeng Liu; Aique Cui; Yidi Gong; Jing Lu; Xin Liu; Xueyun Huo; Jianyi Lv; Meng Guo; Xiaoyan Du; Lingxia Han; Hongyan Chen; Jilan Chen; Changlong Li; Zhenwen Chen
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of Local Chicken Ecotypes in Burkina Faso Using Microsatellite Markers.

Authors:  Zare Yacouba; Houaga Isidore; Kere Michel; Gnanda B Isidore; Traore Boureima; Millogo Vinsoun; Konkobo Maurice; Bandaogo Ousseni; Zongo Moussa; Bougouma-Yameogo M C Valerie; Rekaya Romdhane; Nianogo A Joseph
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 4.141

6.  Genetic diversity and relationships of korean chicken breeds based on 30 microsatellite markers.

Authors:  Sangwon Suh; Aditi Sharma; Seunghwan Lee; Chang-Yeon Cho; Jae-Hwan Kim; Seong-Bok Choi; Hyun Kim; Hwan-Hoo Seong; Seong-Hum Yeon; Dong-Hun Kim; Yeoung-Gyu Ko
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.509

7.  Genetic diversity and population structure of indigenous chicken in Rwanda using microsatellite markers.

Authors:  Richard Habimana; Tobias Otieno Okeno; Kiplangat Ngeno; Sylvere Mboumba; Pauline Assami; Anique Ahou Gbotto; Christian Tiambo Keambou; Kizito Nishimwe; Janvier Mahoro; Nasser Yao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.