Literature DB >> 9627660

Encapsulation of scleral buckling materials. A study of sixty specimens.

F D'Hermies1, J F Korobelnik, G Caputo, B Mashhour, D Chauvaud, Y Pouliquen, G Renard.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to obtain information on the encapsulation of two nonabsorbable biomaterials (silicone and hydrogel) used as explants in scleral buckling in retinal detachment surgery.
DESIGN: The study design was a histopathologic study on a cohort of capsule fractions and complete eyes. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-nine patients participated in this study, in which 60 specimens, including 37 hydrogel and 21 silicone capsule specimens as well as 2 whole eyes, were gathered. There were no control subjects. INTERVENTION: The capsule specimens were obtained from eyes operated on previously for scleral buckling for retinal detachment. The two whole eyes were enucleated. All specimens were studied with routine optic microscopy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient characteristics, type of scleral buckling, and number of operations performed were analyzed. Histologically, the capsular structure, its interface with the explant, and its different components also were studied. Remnants of the buckling material also were investigated.
RESULTS: There were 45 male and 14 female patients, with a mean age of 49 years. Histologically, capsule specimens had a fibrous matrix with fibroblasts and few inflammatory cells. Eighteen (48.6%) of 37 hydrogel capsule specimens displayed hydrogel fragments surrounded by a foreign body giant cell granuloma in 16 cases.
CONCLUSION: Nonabsorbable materials undergo encapsulation after implantation on the eye surface. Giant cell granuloma was observed in some hydrogel capsule specimens in relation to hydrogel fragmentation. The exact origin of this fragmentation remains unknown.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9627660     DOI: 10.1016/S0161-6420(98)96011-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  7 in total

1.  Histopathology of Hydrolyzed MIRAgel Scleral Buckles.

Authors:  Natalie Wolkow; Frederick A Jakobiec
Journal:  Ocul Oncol Pathol       Date:  2021-04-07

2.  MIRAgel: the immunohistochemical expression of CD3, CD34, and CD68 in the surrounding capsule.

Authors:  M Roldan-Pallares; M LLanes-Estrada; F LLanes-Menendez
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Effects of poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) and poly(vinyl-pyrrolidone) hydrogel implants on myopic and normal chick sclera.

Authors:  James Su; Elena Iomdina; Elena Tarutta; Brian Ward; Jie Song; Christine F Wildsoet
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2008-12-11       Impact factor: 3.467

4.  Orbital cellulitis following silicone-sponge scleral buckles.

Authors:  Arie Y Nemet; Joseph R Ferencz; Ori Segal; Amit Meshi
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-10-31

5.  Non-drainage scleral buckling with solid silicone elements.

Authors:  Pukhraj Rishi; Ekta Rishi; Aditi Gupta; Cheriyan Shane Mathew; Bhavesh J Shah
Journal:  Oman J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-05

6.  Clinical-Radiological Correlation of Retained Silicone Sponge Presenting as Orbital Inflammation.

Authors:  Tal J Rubinstein; John Clemett; Charles D Birnbach; Steven J LauKaitis; Bryan S Sires
Journal:  Case Rep Ophthalmol Med       Date:  2016-06-16

7.  Evaluation of tissue interactions with mechanical elements of a transscleral drug delivery device.

Authors:  Sarah J Cohen; Robison V Paul Chan; Mark Keegan; Christopher M Andreoli; Jeffrey T Borenstein; Joan W Miller; Evangelos S Gragoudas
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 6.321

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.