Literature DB >> 9627581

Implantable venous access devices in children with hemophilia: a report of low infection rates.

K Miller1, G R Buchanan, S Zappa, C Cochran, J Laufenberg, D Medeiros, J Sanders.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to define the efficacy and complications of implantable venous access devices (IVADs) in children with hemophilia. STUDY
DESIGN: Records were reviewed on all patients with congenital blood coagulation disorders monitored at two children's hospitals in whom one or more central venous catheters had been placed.
RESULTS: Since 1989 external and implantable central venous catheters have been inserted to enhance venous access for regular factor concentrate infusion in 45 patients with hemophilia ranging in age from 8 months to 19.5 years (median 7.4 years); 37 patients had factor VIII deficiency and 8 factor IX deficiency. Hemorrhagic complications of catheter placement were infrequent and minor. In the 41 patients having one or more IVADs in place for a median of 31 months, only six episodes of bacteremia occurred in 5 patients during 44,070 days of follow-up. The overall rate of bacteremia complicating IVADs in these patients was 0.14 episodes per 1000 catheter days. Other catheter-related complications were uncommon. Catheters are still in place in 33 patients for a median of 32 months.
CONCLUSION: The low risk of infection and other complications associated with the use of IVADs makes the use of these devices attractive in the treatment of patients with hemophilia who require frequent venous access for factor concentrate infusions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9627581     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3476(98)70386-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr        ISSN: 0022-3476            Impact factor:   4.406


  3 in total

1.  Complete prevention of blood loss with self-sealing haemostatic needles.

Authors:  Mikyung Shin; Sung-Gurl Park; Byung-Chang Oh; Keumyeon Kim; Seongyeon Jo; Moon Sue Lee; Seok Song Oh; Seon-Hui Hong; Eui-Cheol Shin; Ki-Suk Kim; Sun-Woong Kang; Haeshin Lee
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 43.841

2.  Cost-utility analysis of primary prophylaxis versus treatment on-demand for individuals with severe haemophilia.

Authors:  Alexander H Miners; Caroline A Sabin; Keith H Tolley; Christine A Lee
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  Access technique and its problems in parenteral nutrition - Guidelines on Parenteral Nutrition, Chapter 9.

Authors:  K W Jauch; W Schregel; Z Stanga; S C Bischoff; P Brass; W Hartl; S Muehlebach; E Pscheidl; P Thul; O Volk
Journal:  Ger Med Sci       Date:  2009-11-18
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.