Literature DB >> 9627342

Kinetic analysis of 2-[carbon-11]thymidine PET imaging studies: compartmental model and mathematical analysis.

D A Mankoff1, A F Shields, M M Graham, J M Link, J F Eary, K A Krohn.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Carbon-11-thymidine is a PET tracer of DNA synthesis and cellular proliferation. Quantitative analysis of [11C]thymidine images is complicated by the presence of significant quantities of labeled metabolites. Estimation of the rate of thymidine incorporation into DNA using [11C]thymidine requires a kinetic model that is capable of describing the behavior of thymidine and labeled metabolites.
METHODS: Based on previous studies with labeled thymidine, we constructed a five-compartment model describing the kinetic behavior of 2-[11C]thymidine and its labeled metabolites. In addition, we have performed a series of calculations and simulations to calculate the sensitivity and identifiability of model parameters to estimate the extent to which individual parameters can be estimated; to determine appropriate model constraints necessary for reproducible estimates of the constant describing flux of thymidine from the blood into DNA, i.e., thymidine flux constant; and to determine the potential accuracy of model parameter and thymidine flux constant estimates from PET imaging data.
RESULTS: The underlying assumptions in the thymidine compartmental model lead to a description of the thymidine flux constant for DNA incorporation in terms of model parameters. Sensitivity and identifiability analyses suggest that the model parameters pertaining to labeled metabolites will be difficult to estimate independently of the thymidine parameters. Exact evaluation of the kinetic parameters of the labeled metabolites is not the principal goal of this model. Simulations were performed that suggest that it is preferable to tightly constrain these parameters to preset values near the center of their expected ranges. Although it is difficult to estimate individual thymidine model parameters, the flux constant for incorporation into DNA can be accurately estimated (r > 0.9 for estimated versus true simulated flux constant). Flux constant estimates are not affected by modest levels of local degradation of thymidine that may occur in proliferating tissue.
CONCLUSION: By using a kinetic model for thymidine and labeled metabolites, it is possible to estimate the flux of thymidine uptake and incorporation into DNA and, thereby, noninvasively estimate regional cellular proliferation using [11C]thymidine and PET.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9627342

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  31 in total

Review 1.  Characterizing tumors using metabolic imaging: PET imaging of cellular proliferation and steroid receptors.

Authors:  D A Mankoff; F Dehdashti; A F Shields
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2000 Jan-Apr       Impact factor: 5.715

Review 2.  Positron emission tomography (PET): expanding the horizons of oncology drug development.

Authors:  Lisa A Hammond; Louis Denis; Umber Salman; Paul Jerabek; Charles R Thomas; John G Kuhn
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 3.  Use of positron emission tomography in anticancer drug development.

Authors:  Eric O Aboagye; Patricia M Price
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 4.  Plasma radiometabolite correction in dynamic PET studies: Insights on the available modeling approaches.

Authors:  Matteo Tonietto; Gaia Rizzo; Mattia Veronese; Masahiro Fujita; Sami S Zoghbi; Paolo Zanotti-Fregonara; Alessandra Bertoldo
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 6.200

5.  Analysis of penalized likelihood image reconstruction for dynamic PET quantification.

Authors:  Guobao Wang; Jinyi Qi
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 10.048

Review 6.  A review of imaging agent development.

Authors:  Eric D Agdeppa; Mary E Spilker
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2009-05-05       Impact factor: 4.009

7.  FLT-PET imaging of radiation responses in murine tumors.

Authors:  M H Pan; S C Huang; Y P Liao; D Schaue; C C Wang; D B Stout; J R Barrio; W H McBride
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 3.488

8.  Kinetic models for analysing myocardial [(11)C]palmitate data.

Authors:  Hugo W A M de Jong; Luuk J Rijzewijk; Mark Lubberink; Rutger W van der Meer; Hildo J Lamb; Jan W A Smit; Michaëla Diamant; Adriaan A Lammertsma
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  Structural and practical identifiability of dual-input kinetic modeling in dynamic PET of liver inflammation.

Authors:  Yang Zuo; Souvik Sarkar; Michael T Corwin; Kristin Olson; Ramsey D Badawi; Guobao Wang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 10.  Positron emission tomography measurement of tumor metabolism and growth: its expanding role in oncology.

Authors:  Anthony F Shields
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.488

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.