Literature DB >> 9626393

Interrater reliability of the Ruff Figural Fluency Test.

L C Berning1, N C Weed, M S Aloia.   

Abstract

To examine interrater reliability of the Ruff Figural Fluency Test (RFFT), 124 college students completed the RFFT and scored RFFT test protocols. Three questions were examined: (a) What is the relationship between RFFT scores obtained by different raters? (b) Do participants improve in RFFT scoring accuracy with practice?, and (c) Are participants who perform better on the RFFT more accurate raters? Interrater reliabilities for unique designs, design perseverations, and error ratios were .93, .74, and .66, respectively. Participants benefitted from practice on scoring with increased accuracy over five protocols. Finally, results indicated a positive relationship between performance on the RFFT and scoring accuracy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9626393     DOI: 10.1177/107319119800500208

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Assessment        ISSN: 1073-1911


  5 in total

1.  Reference data for the Ruff Figural Fluency Test stratified by age and educational level.

Authors:  Gerbrand J Izaks; Hanneke Joosten; Janneke Koerts; Ron T Gansevoort; Joris P Slaets
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-02-10       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Mediating effects of cognitive effort and depression on intelligence, memory, and executive functions in individuals with mild traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Kyoung-Sae Na; Han-Yong Jung; Soyoung Irene Lee; Shin-Gyeom Kim
Journal:  Psychiatry Investig       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 2.505

3.  A Computerized Test of Design Fluency.

Authors:  David L Woods; John M Wyma; Timothy J Herron; E William Yund
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Agreement between Computerized and Human Assessment of Performance on the Ruff Figural Fluency Test.

Authors:  Martin F Elderson; Sander Pham; Marlise E A van Eersel; Bruce H R Wolffenbuttel; Johan Kok; Ron T Gansevoort; Oliver Tucha; Melanie M van der Klauw; Joris P J Slaets; Gerbrand J Izaks
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Correlation between executive function and quantitative EEG in patients with anxiety by the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) framework.

Authors:  Su Hyun Bong; Tae Young Choi; Kyoung Min Kim; Jaewon Lee; Jun Won Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.