Literature DB >> 9626315

Long-term results of classic antireflux surgery in 152 patients with Barrett's esophagus: clinical, radiologic, endoscopic, manometric, and acid reflux test analysis before and late after operation.

A Csendes1, I Braghetto, P Burdiles, G Puente, O Korn, J C Díaz, F Maluenda.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The classic surgical procedure for patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE) has been either Nissen fundoplication or posterior gastropexy with calibration of the cardia.
METHODS: The purpose of our study was to determine late subjective and objective results of these classic surgical techniques in a large number of patients with BE. A total of 152 patients were included in this prospective protocol.
RESULTS: There was 1 death (0.7%) after operation. The late follow-up of 100 months demonstrated a high percentage of failures among patients with noncomplicated BE (54%) and an even higher figure in patients with complicated BE (64%). In 15 patients low grade dysplasia appeared at 8 years of follow-up and an adenocarcinoma in 4 patients. Twenty-four-hour pH monitoring demonstrated a decrease in acid reflux into the esophagus, and Bilitec studies also demonstrated a decrease of duodenoesophageal reflux, but in all cases with a higher value than the normal limit.
CONCLUSIONS: Classic antireflux surgery in patients with BE results in a high percentage of failures at very late follow-up because it cannot completely avoid acid and duodenal reflux into the esophagus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9626315

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  40 in total

1.  The pathogenesis of Barrett's esophagus: a process in continuum or discontinuum.

Authors:  R C Fitzgerald; M J Farthing
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2000-12

Review 2.  Update in internal medicine.

Authors:  F López-Jiménez; M Brito; Y W Aude; P Scheinberg; M Kaplan; D A Dixon; N Schneiderman; J F Trejo; L H López-Salazar; E J Ramírez-Barba; R Kalil; C Ortiz; J Goyos; A Buenaño; S Kottiech; G A Lamas
Journal:  Arch Med Res       Date:  2000 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.235

Review 3.  Digestive system disorders: gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  D A Katzka
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  2000-07

4.  Multivariate analysis of factors predicting outcome after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication.

Authors:  A Csendes
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Long-term results of a randomized prospective study comparing medical and surgical treatment of Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Pascual Parrilla; Luisa F Martínez de Haro; Angeles Ortiz; Vicente Munitiz; Joaquín Molina; Juan Bermejo; Manuel Canteras
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Early and late results of the acid suppression and duodenal diversion operation in patients with barrett's esophagus: analysis of 210 cases.

Authors:  Attila Csendes; Patricio Burdiles; Italo Braghetto; Owen Korn; Juan Carlos Díaz; Jorge Rojas
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2002-03-01       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 7.  Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Jeffrey H Peters; Jeffrey A Hagen; Steven R DeMeester
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 8.  How should Barrett's ulceration be treated?

Authors:  J H Peters; K K Wang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-01-12       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Laparoscopic fundoplication is the treatment of choice for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Protagonist.

Authors:  L Lundell
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  Impact of the biliary diversion procedure on carcinogenesis in Barrett's esophagus surgically induced by duodenoesophageal reflux in rats.

Authors:  Koji Nishijima; Koichi Miwa; Tomoharu Miyashita; Shinichi Kinami; Itasu Ninomiya; Sachio Fushida; Takashi Fujimura; Takanori Hattori
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.