PURPOSE: bcl-2 protein is detectable in human cancers and may be involved in the response to antineoplastic drugs or endocrine therapy in breast carcinomas. In a previous study, we had developed optimal technical conditions for bcl-2 immunodetection. The aim of the present report was to determine the prognostic significance of bcl-2 expression in breast carinomas by the use of a similar immunocytochemical procedure. METHODS: bcl-2 immunocytochemical assays were performed on frozen sections by automated immunoperoxidase technique (Ventana) and computer-assisted analysis of digitized colored microscopic images (SAMBA) in a series of 170 breast carcinomas. The results of automated quantitative immunocytochemical assays were correlated with patient follow-up (120 months). RESULTS: Intense bcl-2 immunocytochemical expression in tumors (cutpoint, 15%) significantly correlated with longer disease-free survival and longer recurrence-free survival in the entire cohort of patients (P = .028 and P = .035, respectively) and also in node-negative subgroups of patients (P = .028 and P = .01; Kaplan-Meier long-rank test; NCSS 6.0.1 software). But bcl-2 immunostained surfaces (cutpoint, 15%) did not correlate with overall survival. In multivariate analysis (proportional hazards regression, Cox model), bcl-2 prognostic significance in terms of disease-free survival was only independent of the tumor size and grade and histoprognostic index (Nottingham prognostic index [NPI]). CONCLUSION: bcl-2 immunohistochemical expression is a significant indicator of favorable outcome only in terms of disease-free and local recurrence-free survival. However, bcl-2 expression in tumors is an independent weakly prognostic indicator in breast carcinomas. bcl-2 immunodetection assessed in optimal technical conditions (frozen samples, automation, quantitative analysis, scatter diagram cutoffs) may have some limited practical clinical relevance for the management of patients with breast carcinomas.
PURPOSE:bcl-2 protein is detectable in humancancers and may be involved in the response to antineoplastic drugs or endocrine therapy in breast carcinomas. In a previous study, we had developed optimal technical conditions for bcl-2 immunodetection. The aim of the present report was to determine the prognostic significance of bcl-2 expression in breast carinomas by the use of a similar immunocytochemical procedure. METHODS:bcl-2 immunocytochemical assays were performed on frozen sections by automated immunoperoxidase technique (Ventana) and computer-assisted analysis of digitized colored microscopic images (SAMBA) in a series of 170 breast carcinomas. The results of automated quantitative immunocytochemical assays were correlated with patient follow-up (120 months). RESULTS: Intense bcl-2 immunocytochemical expression in tumors (cutpoint, 15%) significantly correlated with longer disease-free survival and longer recurrence-free survival in the entire cohort of patients (P = .028 and P = .035, respectively) and also in node-negative subgroups of patients (P = .028 and P = .01; Kaplan-Meier long-rank test; NCSS 6.0.1 software). But bcl-2 immunostained surfaces (cutpoint, 15%) did not correlate with overall survival. In multivariate analysis (proportional hazards regression, Cox model), bcl-2 prognostic significance in terms of disease-free survival was only independent of the tumor size and grade and histoprognostic index (Nottingham prognostic index [NPI]). CONCLUSION:bcl-2 immunohistochemical expression is a significant indicator of favorable outcome only in terms of disease-free and local recurrence-free survival. However, bcl-2 expression in tumors is an independent weakly prognostic indicator in breast carcinomas. bcl-2 immunodetection assessed in optimal technical conditions (frozen samples, automation, quantitative analysis, scatter diagram cutoffs) may have some limited practical clinical relevance for the management of patients with breast carcinomas.
Authors: S-J Dawson; N Makretsov; F M Blows; K E Driver; E Provenzano; J Le Quesne; L Baglietto; G Severi; G G Giles; C A McLean; G Callagy; A R Green; I Ellis; K Gelmon; G Turashvili; S Leung; S Aparicio; D Huntsman; C Caldas; P Pharoah Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2010-07-27 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: S Garcia; J-P Dalès; J Jacquemier; E Charafe-Jauffret; D Birnbaum; L Andrac-Meyer; M-N Lavaut; C Allasia; S Carpentier-Meunier; P Bonnier; C Charpin-Taranger Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2007-01-29 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: C Charpin; S Giusiano; S Charfi; V Secq; S Carpentier; L Andrac; M-N Lavaut; C Allasia; P Bonnier; S Garcia Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2009-06-09 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: M McCallum; C Baker; K Gillespie; B Cohen; H Stewart; R Leonard; D Cameron; R Leake; J Paxton; A Robertson; C Purdie; A Gould; M Steel Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2004-05-17 Impact factor: 7.640