Literature DB >> 9625663

Cooperation: the foundation of improvement.

T P Clemmer1, V J Spuhler, D M Berwick, T W Nolan.   

Abstract

Cooperation--working together to produce mutual benefit or attain a common purpose--is almost inseparable from the quest for improvement. Although the case for cooperation can be made on ethical grounds, neither the motivation for nor the effects of cooperation need to be interpreted solely in terms of altruism. Cooperation can be a shrewd and pragmatic strategy for accomplishing personal goals in an interdependent system. Earlier papers in this series have explored the conceptual roots of modern approaches to improvement, which lie in systems theory. To improve systems, we must usually attend first and foremost to interactions. Among humans, "better interaction" is almost synonymous with "better cooperation." Physicians have ample opportunities and, indeed, an obligation to cooperate with other physicians in the same or different specialties, with nurses and other clinical workers, with administrators, and with patients and families. Many intellectual disciplines have made cooperation an object of study. These include anthropology; social psychology; genetics; biology; mathematics; game theory; linguistics; operations research; economics; and, of course, moral and rational philosophy. Scientifically grounded methods to enhance cooperation include developing a shared purpose; creating an open, safe environment; including all who share a common purpose and encouraging diverse viewpoints; negotiating agreement; and insisting on fairness and equity in the application of rules. These methods apply at the organizational level and at the level of the individual physician. This paper describes the application of these methods at the organizational level and focuses on one especially successful example of system-level cooperation in a care delivery site where interactions matter a great deal: the modern intensive care unit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9625663     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-128-12_part_1-199806150-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  20 in total

Review 1.  Problems for clinical judgement: 3. Thinking clearly in an emergency.

Authors:  M J Schull; L E Ferris; J V Tu; J E Hux; D A Redelmeier
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-04-17       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Ambulatory internal medicine training: challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  David C Dugdale
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Decision support and safety of clinical environments.

Authors:  A H Morris
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2002-03

4.  Validation of an instrument to measure pharmacy and medical students' attitudes toward physician-pharmacist collaboration.

Authors:  Lon J Van Winkle; Nancy Fjortoft; Mohammadreza Hojat
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 2.047

5.  Assessment of an intervention to train teaching hospital care providers in quality management.

Authors:  P François; D Vinck; J Labarère; T Reverdy; J-C Peyrin
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2005-08

6.  Towards ubiquitous peer review strategies to sustain and enhance a clinical knowledge management framework.

Authors:  Roberto A Rocha; Richard L Bradshaw; Sharon M Bigelow; Timothy P Hanna; Guilherme Del Fiol; Nathan C Hulse; Lorrie K Roemer; Steven G Wilkinson
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2006

Review 7.  Planning and studying improvement in patient care: the use of theoretical perspectives.

Authors:  Richard P T M Grol; Marije C Bosch; Marlies E J L Hulscher; Martin P Eccles; Michel Wensing
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.911

Review 8.  Developing physician-leaders: a call to action.

Authors:  James K Stoller
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Critical thinking and reflection exercises in a biochemistry course to improve prospective health professions students' attitudes toward physician-pharmacist collaboration.

Authors:  Lon J Van Winkle; Susan Cornell; Nancy Fjortoft; Bryan C Bjork; Nalini Chandar; Jacalyn M Green; Sophie La Salle; Susan M Viselli; Paulette Burdick; Sean M Lynch
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 2.047

Review 10.  National standards for diabetes self-management education.

Authors:  Martha M Funnell; Tammy L Brown; Belinda P Childs; Linda B Haas; Gwen M Hosey; Brian Jensen; Melinda Maryniuk; Mark Peyrot; John D Piette; Diane Reader; Linda M Siminerio; Katie Weinger; Michael A Weiss
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 19.112

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.