Literature DB >> 9625484

Genetic toxicology.

P J Kramer1.   

Abstract

Systems for testing genetic toxicology are components of carcinogenic and genetic risk assessment. Present routine genotoxicity-testing is based on at least 20 years of development during which many different test systems have been introduced and used. Today, it is clear that no single test is capable of detecting all genotoxic agents. Therefore, the usual approach is to perform a standard battery of in-vitro and in-vivo tests for genotoxicity. Work-groups of the European Union (EU), the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), and, very recently, the work-group of the International Conference on Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) have defined such standard battery tests. These and some currently used supplementary or confirmatory tests are briefly discussed here. Additional test systems for the assessment of genotoxic and carcinogenic hazard and risk are seriously needed. These tests must be more relevant to man than are current assays and less demanding in respect of cost, time and number of animals. Another aspect for reassessment derives from the actual situation in the pharmaceutical industry. Companies have to prepare for the world economy of the 21st century. Therefore, pharmaceutical research is speeding up tremendously by use of tools such as genomics, combinatorial chemistry, high throughput screening and proteomics. Toxicology and genotoxicology need to re-evaluate their changing environment and must find ways to respond to these needs. In conclusion, genetic toxicology needs to answer questions coming from two major directions: hazard and risk identification and high throughput testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9625484     DOI: 10.1111/j.2042-7158.1998.tb06879.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharm Pharmacol        ISSN: 0022-3573            Impact factor:   3.765


  2 in total

1.  Comparative analyses of genotoxicity, oxidative stress and antioxidative defence system under exposure of methyl parathion and hexaconazole in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.).

Authors:  Pragyan Dubey; Amit Kumar Mishra; Ashok Kumar Singh
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  A Study of Micronucleus Induction with Methyl Formate and 2-Methylbutane in Bone Marrow Cells of Male ICR Mice.

Authors:  Soo-Jin Kim; Kyung-Taek Rim; Min-Gu Kang; Jong-Kyu Kim; Yong-Hyun Chung; Jeong-Sun Yang
Journal:  Saf Health Work       Date:  2010-09-30
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.