BACKGROUND: Though community-oriented primary care (COPC) has been advocated as an effective way of addressing health problems of communities, it is neither widely understood nor frequently practiced. Because COPC requires an extended period of time, as well as an approach and skills not generally learned in medical training, effectively incorporating COPC training into medical education is difficult and not frequently attempted. This paper describes a COPC curriculum for family practice residents based on required participation in a longitudinal group project. METHODS: Residents participated in successive groups that completed a COPC project over a 2-year period. Twenty-two of 26 PGY-2 residents completed an attitude and knowledge test before and after participation in the curriculum. A qualitative evaluation of the curriculum was also performed. RESULTS: Pretest and posttest responses showed significant improvement in residents' knowledge about COPC and a small but significant decline in attitudes toward COPC. Residents' reactions to the curriculum in the qualitative evaluation were both positive and negative. Residents enjoyed the group process and found it intellectually stimulating. Many reported, however, that they did not feel ownership of the project, that working through the four-step systematic COPC process was slow and cumbersome, and that they had learned only part of the COPC process. Residents consistently reported becoming more aware of the importance of discussing the focus of the project (i.e., childhood discipline or domestic violence) with their patients and feeling more comfortable initiating such discussions. CONCLUSIONS: A COPC curriculum based on required participation in a 2-year group project promoted completion of substantial projects. There were trade-offs in resident experience, including loss of continuity for individual residents. Effectively teaching COPC and engaging residents in community-oriented activities remains a challenge.
BACKGROUND: Though community-oriented primary care (COPC) has been advocated as an effective way of addressing health problems of communities, it is neither widely understood nor frequently practiced. Because COPC requires an extended period of time, as well as an approach and skills not generally learned in medical training, effectively incorporating COPC training into medical education is difficult and not frequently attempted. This paper describes a COPC curriculum for family practice residents based on required participation in a longitudinal group project. METHODS: Residents participated in successive groups that completed a COPC project over a 2-year period. Twenty-two of 26 PGY-2 residents completed an attitude and knowledge test before and after participation in the curriculum. A qualitative evaluation of the curriculum was also performed. RESULTS: Pretest and posttest responses showed significant improvement in residents' knowledge about COPC and a small but significant decline in attitudes toward COPC. Residents' reactions to the curriculum in the qualitative evaluation were both positive and negative. Residents enjoyed the group process and found it intellectually stimulating. Many reported, however, that they did not feel ownership of the project, that working through the four-step systematic COPC process was slow and cumbersome, and that they had learned only part of the COPC process. Residents consistently reported becoming more aware of the importance of discussing the focus of the project (i.e., childhood discipline or domestic violence) with their patients and feeling more comfortable initiating such discussions. CONCLUSIONS: A COPC curriculum based on required participation in a 2-year group project promoted completion of substantial projects. There were trade-offs in resident experience, including loss of continuity for individual residents. Effectively teaching COPC and engaging residents in community-oriented activities remains a challenge.
Authors: Benjamin A Howell; Ross B Kristal; Lacey R Whitmire; Mark Gentry; Tracy L Rabin; Julie Rosenbaum Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2019-11 Impact factor: 5.128