Literature DB >> 9624410

Reducing variability in treatment decision-making: effectiveness of educating clinicians about uncertainty.

B C Choi1, A Jokovic, E J Kay, P A Main, J L Leake.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate whether or not education about the concept of uncertainty reduced variability in treatment decision-making. Three small groups of dentists in North York, Canada were asked to make restorative treatment decisions about simulated bitewing radiographs. They subsequently took part in a seminar about variations in perception and judgement and were given explanations of sensitivity, specificity and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. A repeat reading of the radiographs was then performed by both test and control groups. Results indicated that the intervention increased the accuracy, and decreased the variability of dentists' restorative treatment decisions. Kappa statistics were 0.33, 0.34 and 0.31 before the seminar, and 0.40, 0.43 and 0.41 after the seminar. Standard errors for kappas were 0.06, 0.05 and 0.05 before the seminar, and 0.02, 0.02 and 0.05 after the seminar. The area under the ROC curve was 0.7136 before the seminar and 0.7835 after the seminar. The data demonstrate that the dentists' decisions were less variable and more accurate following the educative intervention. This study suggests that there is potential for improving consistency and accuracy in clinical decision-making through education in probabilistic reasoning.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9624410     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.1998.00153.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Educ        ISSN: 0308-0110            Impact factor:   6.251


  3 in total

1.  Educating chiropractic students about intraobserver and interobserver variability through the use of skinfold measurement.

Authors:  Marc P McRae
Journal:  J Chiropr Educ       Date:  2009

2.  Twelve essentials of science-based policy.

Authors:  Bernard C K Choi
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 2.830

3.  How do clinicians rate patient's performance status using the ECOG performance scale? A mixed-methods exploration of variability in decision-making in oncology.

Authors:  Soumitra S Datta; Niladri Ghosal; Rhea Daruvala; Santam Chakraborty; Raj Kumar Shrimali; Chantalle van Zanten; Joe Parry; Sanjit Agrawal; Shrikant Atreya; Subir Sinha; Sanjoy Chatterjee; Simon Gollins
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2019-03-28
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.