Literature DB >> 9623618

Determination of serum creatinine prior to iodinated contrast media: is it necessary in all patients?

P L Choyke1, J Cady, S L DePollar, H Austin.   

Abstract

The risk of contrast-associated nephrotoxicity (CAN) is increased in the presence of preexisting renal disease. Although routine determination of serum creatinine (Cr) prior to imaging studies is the traditional method of assessing renal function, it is a costly and time-consuming practice. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether a patient survey could identify patients with a high likelihood of having normal Cr values and who, therefore, did not require serum testing. A survey was administered to 673 consecutive adult patients who were scheduled for contrast-enhanced computed tomography. Survey questions were designed to elicit a history of renal disorders as well as additional risk factors for CAN. Each patient had a Cr level determined within 48 hours prior to the injection of iodinated contrast media. Cr levels were assessed in the patients who gave negative responses to all survey questions. The degree to which positive responses to each survey question predicted elevated Cr levels was determined using the odds ratio (OR). Among the 673 respondents, 577 (85%) had normal Cr values (< or =1.3 mg/dL for women and < or =1.4 mg/dL for men). Completely negative responses to the questionnaire occurred in 191 (28%) of 673 of respondents, and 176 (92%) of these 191 had normal Cr values. A Cr cutoff value of 1.7 mg/dL is used in our department, i.e., patients with Cr values >1.7 mg/dL usually do not receive iodinated contrast media. Using this Cr cutoff value, 189 (99%) of 191 patients with negative responses had Cr values less than or equal to the cutoff value. The survey questions most strongly associated with elevated Cr values pertained to preexisting renal disease (OR 13.6), proteinuria (OR 8.7), prior kidney surgery (OR 8.1), hypertension (OR 5.4), gout (OR 4.6), and diabetes (OR 3.2). If the survey had been limited to these six questions, completely negative responses would have occurred in 450 (67%) of 673, 424 (94%) of these 450 would have normal Cr values, and 446 (99%) of 450 would have had Cr values at or below the 1.7 mg/dL cutoff for iodinated contrast. A completely negative response to a simple (six question) patient survey prior to iodinated contrast administration can identify a significant fraction of patients with normal Cr levels. Use of this survey could reduce by 67% the number of patients undergoing routine Cr determinations prior to imaging studies. This could reduce costs, decrease delays, and increase patient satisfaction associated with imaging studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9623618

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tech Urol        ISSN: 1079-3259


  20 in total

1.  Urine protein as a rapid screen for renal function in the ED: can it replace serum creatinine in selected patients?

Authors:  Jonathan Glauser; Aaron Montgomery
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2004-05-05

Review 2.  Renal-related adverse effects of intravenous contrast media in computed tomography.

Authors:  Kheng Song Leow; Yi Wei Wu; Cher Heng Tan
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.858

Review 3.  Practical administration of intravenous contrast media in children: screening, prophylaxis, administration and treatment of adverse reactions.

Authors:  Ezekiel Maloney; Ramesh S Iyer; Grace S Phillips; Shina Menon; John J Lee; Michael J Callahan
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2019-03-29

4.  Is measurement of renal function necessary for all trauma patients before iodinated contrast administration?

Authors:  Haddon Pantel; Kristian D Stensland; Jeffrey Hashim; Michael Rosenblatt
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2017-05-11

5.  Is point of care renal function testing reliable screening pre-IV contrast administration?

Authors:  Namit Mathur; Zhong X Lu; Lisa MacKay; Theodore Lau; Ahilan Kuganesan; Kenneth K Lau
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2020-07-29

6.  Screening patients to assess renal function before administering gadolinium chelates: assessment of the Choyke questionnaire.

Authors:  Brena F Sena; Julia P Stern; Pari V Pandharipande; Barbara Klemm; Julie Bulman; Ivan Pedrosa; Neil M Rofsky
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 7.  Contrast-medium-induced nephropathy: is there a new consensus? A review of published guidelines.

Authors:  Henrik S Thomsen; Sameh K Morcos
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-05-04       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 8.  Contrast-induced acute kidney injury: specialty-specific protocols for interventional radiology, diagnostic computed tomography radiology, and interventional cardiology.

Authors:  Stanley Goldfarb; Peter A McCullough; John McDermott; Spencer B Gay
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 7.616

9.  New guidelines on the use of iodinated contrast media: a report on an implementation project.

Authors:  M G Bonetti; A Vesprini; M Concetti; S Ventrella; M F Spagna; S Mancinelli; M Santini; A Romanelli; P Pantanetti; C Cameli; L Bonanni; L Baffoni
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 3.469

10.  Contrast material-induced nephrotoxicity and intravenous low-osmolality iodinated contrast material.

Authors:  Matthew S Davenport; Shokoufeh Khalatbari; Jonathan R Dillman; Richard H Cohan; Elaine M Caoili; James H Ellis
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 11.105

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.