Literature DB >> 9623458

The Quality of Surgical Care Project: benchmark standards of open resection for abdominal aortic aneurysm in Western Australia.

J B Semmens1, M M Lawrence-Brown, P E Norman, J P Codde, C D Holman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Quality of Surgical Care Project (QSCP) was established in May 1996, to evaluate surgical outcomes and where indicated, recommend changes to improve the quality of surgical care in Western Australia (WA). The purpose of this study is to establish benchmark standards in WA for operative mortality, 5-year survival and length of stay in all patients who were surgically treated for aneurysm of the abdominal aorta (AAA) in WA.
METHODS: The WA Linked Database was used to link the morbidity and mortality records of all patients admitted and surgically treated for AAA in WA from 1985 to 1994. The linked chains of de-identified hospital morbidity and death records were selected using diagnostic and procedure codes pertaining to AAA. Three groups were separated for analysis: those admitted for rupture, those admitted for elective repair, and those who were admitted to hospital as an emergency without mention of rupture but who underwent repair for AAA. Independent analysis for gender and patients 80 years or more were included in the study. Patients were excluded from the study if they were less than 55 years of age.
RESULTS: A total of 1475 cases (1257 males, 218 females) were identified. The mean age in elective cases was 70.4 years in males and 72.4 years in females, and for rupture the mean ages were 71.9 and 74.8 years, respectively. Median length of stay for males was 12 days for elective cases. Admission type or age did not significantly influence length of stay. Thirty-day mortality in males was 4.4% for elective repair and 36.7% for ruptured AAA and 5-year survival was 71.7 and 47.7%, respectively. The overall case fatality rate for ruptured AAA was 79.3% which included those cases who died from rupture without being admitted to hospital.
CONCLUSIONS: These community-wide data provide a realistic measure of surgical performance for open repair of AAA. The outcomes for elective and rupture repair for AAA compare favourably with standards reported by international centres of excellence. They also support the use of this procedure in patients over 80 years of age with rupture. This information can be used for ongoing audit purposes and as a benchmark for the introduction of new treatment modalities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9623458     DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1998.tb04787.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust N Z J Surg        ISSN: 0004-8682


  3 in total

Review 1.  Outcome after open repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm in patients>80 years old: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fausto Biancari; Maria Alessandra Mazziotti; Rosalba Paone; Sani Laukontaus; Maarit Venermo; Mauri Lepäntalo
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Population based randomised controlled trial on impact of screening on mortality from abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Authors:  Paul E Norman; Konrad Jamrozik; Michael M Lawrence-Brown; Max T Q Le; Carole A Spencer; Raywin J Tuohy; Richard W Parsons; James A Dickinson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-11-15

3.  Elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a seven-year experience.

Authors:  Stuart Mackenzie; Judith R Swan; Cate D'Este; Allan D Spigelman
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.423

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.