Literature DB >> 9623373

Subfascial endoscopic perforator vein surgery (SEPS): current practice among British surgeons.

M S Whiteley1, J J Smith, R B Galland.   

Abstract

Subfascial endoscopic perforator vein surgery (SEPS) has recently caused considerable interest among British surgeons. There are no data indicating which, if any, patients benefit from SEPS. A series of 47 British surgeons, identified as having taken up SEPS, were sent a questionnaire asking about their current practice; 26 were returned completed (55% response rate). Of those surgeons replying, 22 (85%) had performed their first SEPS procedure within the previous 21 months, 18 (69%) within the previous 9 months. Most surgeons had performed five procedures (range 1-52). The most common indication for SEPS was venous ulceration with proven incompetent perforators (eight surgeons), but there was a wide diversity of other indications used to select patients for SEPS. Only nine surgeons had changed their indications for surgery with the advent of SEPS, yet their predicted number of SEPS procedures was far greater than the number of open procedures they currently performed. Out of 26 surgeons, 25 intend to continue performing SEPS. Prospective studies are needed to identify which patients might benefit from this new procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9623373      PMCID: PMC2502990     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  20 in total

1.  THE DIAGNOSIS AND LIGATION OF INCOMPETENT ANKLE PERFORATING VEINS.

Authors:  H DODD
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1964-03       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  The pathology and treatment of venous ulcers of the leg.

Authors:  F B COCKETT
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1955-11       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  The post-thrombotic ulceration of the lower extremity: its etiology and surgical treatment.

Authors:  R R LINTON
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1953-09       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Discharge within 24 hours of elective cholecystectomy. The first 100 patients.

Authors:  G Moss
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1986-10

5.  Tibial nerve damage during subfascial endoscopic perforator vein surgery.

Authors:  M S Whiteley; J J Smith; R B Galland
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Surgical research or comic opera: questions, but few answers.

Authors:  R Horton
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-04-13       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Ambulatory cholecystectomy without disability.

Authors:  W P Ledet
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1990-11

8.  Relation between postphlebitic changes in the deep veins and results of surgical treatment of venous ulcers.

Authors:  K Burnand; M L Thomas; T O'Donnell; N L Browse
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1976-05-01       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Long saphenous incompetence as a cause of venous ulceration.

Authors:  K K Sethia; S G Darke
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Simultaneous dynamic electromyographic proctography and cystometrography.

Authors:  A C Thorpe; N S Williams; D F Badenoch; J P Blandy; M F Grahn
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  2 in total

1.  Subfascial hemorrhage after endoscopic perforator vein ligation: control with balloon tamponade.

Authors:  W T Ng; Y T Wong; H Y Leung
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Subfascial endoscopic perforator vein surgery (SEPS) using the ultrasonic scalpel.

Authors:  D W Lee; A C Chan; Y H Lam; S K Wong; E K Ng; B K Law; S C Chung
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.584

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.